» Articles » PMID: 24992059

Effect of High Hip Center on Stress for Dysplastic Hip

Overview
Journal Orthopedics
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Jul 4
PMID 24992059
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

High hip center reconstruction has been advocated in treating deficient acetabulum. However, there is no consensus on the clinical outcome of this technique. In addition, it remains unclear to what extend this technique restores the normal hip biomechanics. The goal of this study was to investigate stress above the acetabular dome in response to a range of high hip center positioning for Crowe type I and II hip dysplasia. This study consisted of 2 main parts, radiologic and biomechanical. Pelvic radiographs of 18 patients were studied to determine the amount of displacement of the hip center in the superior direction compared with the normal side. Second, qualitative and quantitative changes in stress on cortical and trabecular bone in the region of the acetabular dome as a result of superior displacement of the hip center were analyzed with subject-specific finite element models. The results showed that the range of the hip center position in the superior direction for Crowe type I and II hip dysplasia was 0 to 15 mm above the contralateral femoral head center. When superior displacement of the hip center exceeded 5 mm above the anatomic hip center, cortical bone mass on the 2 thickest cross-sections above the acetabular dome decreased quickly and the stress value on posterolateral cortical bone was obviously lower than the normal level. This study showed that to restore the normal load above the acetabular dome, there is a limit of 5 mm above the anatomic hip center for high hip center acetabular reconstruction for Crowe type I and II hip dysplasia.

Citing Articles

The roof step cut: A novel technique for bony reconstruction of acetabular roof deficiency during total hip replacement.

Csernatony Z, Gyorfi G, Barna S, Mano S, Szabo J, Zhang L Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022; 33(1):9-16.

PMID: 35361075 PMC: 9057543. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.266.


Primary Stability in Hip Revision Arthroplasty: Comparison of the Stability of Cementless Fixed Augments on a Modular Acetabular Cage System with and without Cranial Straps.

Jaenisch M, Kohlhof H, Wirtz D, Schildberg F, Beckmann N, Kretzer J J Clin Med. 2021; 10(17).

PMID: 34501450 PMC: 8432542. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10174002.


Best bone of acetabulum for cup component placement in Crowe types I to III dysplastic hips: a computer simulation study.

Zheng L, Lin Y, Zhang X, Ling Q, Liao W, Wu P Chin Med J (Engl). 2019; 132(23):2820-2826.

PMID: 31856053 PMC: 6940065. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000527.


Comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabular components and augments.

Beckmann N, Bitsch R, Gondan M, Schonhoff M, Jaeger S Bone Joint Res. 2018; 7(4):282-288.

PMID: 29922446 PMC: 5987680. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.74.BJR-2017-0198.R1.


The direct anterior approach for acetabular augmentation in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Honcharuk E, Kayiaros S, Rubin L Arthroplast Today. 2018; 4(1):33-39.

PMID: 29560393 PMC: 5859514. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.03.007.