» Articles » PMID: 24991412

Optimizing Immune-related Tumor Response Assessment: Does Reducing the Number of Lesions Impact Response Assessment in Melanoma Patients Treated with Ipilimumab?

Overview
Date 2014 Jul 4
PMID 24991412
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Investigate the impact of the reduction of the number of target lesions on immune-related response assessment in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab.

Method: Ninety patients (53 males, 37 females; age range: 25-87) with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab in two clinical trials were studied. Tumor measurements during trial allowing up to 5 lesions per organ and 10 lesions in total were retrospectively reviewed. A second set of tumor measurements allowing up to 2 lesions per organ and 5 lesions in total was generated. Immune-related response assessments by two measurements were compared.

Results: The number of target lesions was significantly reduced when up to 2 per organ and 5 in total lesions were allowed (Wilcoxon P < 0.0001). The immune-related response assessment using reduced number of lesions was highly concordant with assessment using the original number of lesions (Spearman r for the percent change on 1(st)-3(rd) follow-up: 0.860-0.970; κw for best immune-related response: 0.908). Median time-to-progression was 26.9 months (95%CI: 9.1-∞) by both assessments. Interobserver agreement of measurements was high for both assessments, with the concordance correlation coefficient above 0.98.

Conclusion: Reduction of the number of target lesions did not significantly affect immune-related response assessment or the measurement variability in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Using up to 2 per organ and 5 in total target lesions is proposed to assess immune-related response, while it is important to keep other novel features of immune-related response criteria such as confirmation of progression and inclusion of new lesion measurements.

Citing Articles

Assessing Radiological Response to Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: An Evolving Arena.

Rallis K, Makker S, Ghose A, Sideris M Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024; 4(1):1-8.

PMID: 38173660 PMC: 10758839. DOI: 10.21873/cdp.10278.


A phase 1, first-in-child, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the oncolytic herpes virus talimogene laherparepvec in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors.

Moreno L, Teira P, Croop J, Gerber N, Andre N, Aerts I Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1183295.

PMID: 37292376 PMC: 10244735. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1183295.


A phase II study of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin in BRCA-related metastatic breast cancer (PEMBRACA).

Cortesi L, Venturelli M, Cortesi G, Caggia F, Toss A, Barbieri E ESMO Open. 2023; 8(2):101207.

PMID: 37028000 PMC: 10163155. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101207.


Radiopharmaceuticals as Novel Immune System Tracers.

Ridge N, Rajkumar-Calkins A, Dudzinski S, Kirschner A, Newman N Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 7(5):100936.

PMID: 36148374 PMC: 9486425. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100936.


Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global Phase III Trial of Talimogene Laherparepvec Combined With Pembrolizumab for Advanced Melanoma.

Chesney J, Ribas A, Long G, Kirkwood J, Dummer R, Puzanov I J Clin Oncol. 2022; 41(3):528-540.

PMID: 35998300 PMC: 9870217. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.00343.


References
1.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

2.
Lynch T, Bondarenko I, Luft A, Serwatowski P, Barlesi F, Chacko R . Ipilimumab in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin as first-line treatment in stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(17):2046-54. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.4032. View

3.
ODay S, Maio M, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gajewski T, Pehamberger H, Bondarenko I . Efficacy and safety of ipilimumab monotherapy in patients with pretreated advanced melanoma: a multicenter single-arm phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2010; 21(8):1712-1717. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq013. View

4.
Nishino M, Jagannathan J, Ramaiya N, Van Den Abbeele A . Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195(2):281-9. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.4110. View

5.
Nishino M, Jagannathan J, Krajewski K, ORegan K, Hatabu H, Shapiro G . Personalized tumor response assessment in the era of molecular medicine: cancer-specific and therapy-specific response criteria to complement pitfalls of RECIST. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198(4):737-45. PMC: 3369700. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7483. View