» Articles » PMID: 24990185

The Relationship Between Socio-economic Factors and Responsiveness Gaps in Primary, Preventative and Health Promotion Services

Overview
Journal Health Expect
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Jul 4
PMID 24990185
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine whether there are individual level factors such as socio-economic status that may predict disparities in the public's experiences with and expectations of their health-care providers.

Data Sources/study Setting: Primary data were collected in 2010. The sample comprised of 1211 Israeli citizens above the age of 18.

Study Design: Participants were randomly approached at one points in time and presented with statements regarding practices they experience and practices that are important to them related to primary care, preventive care and health promotion. We calculated a difference scores for each health-care area. We measured socio-economic status (SES) with three separate variables relating to income, education and living location.

Data Collection/extraction Methods: Employees of a professional telephone survey firm conducted the survey. Multiple regression was used with the responsiveness gap in each of three health-care areas as the dependent variables.

Principal Findings: We found that level of education is negatively related to the extent of the responsiveness gap in both primary and preventive health care and that income is negatively related to the responsiveness gap in health promotion.

Conclusions: Personal characteristics such as SES are related to people's perceptions about the extent of the responsiveness gap. Policy makers can now expend efforts and resources in minimizing such responsiveness gaps among specific populations.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness and impact of covid-19 response and vaccination challenges in Namibia: A systematic review.

Niikondo A, Awofolu O J Public Health Afr. 2024; 14(12):2094.

PMID: 38269104 PMC: 10807368. DOI: 10.4081/jphia.2024.2094.


Impact of socioeconomic status on patient experience on quality of care for ambulatory healthcare services in tertiary hospitals in Southeast Nigeria.

Aloh H, Onwujekwe O, Aloh O, Okoronkwo I, Nweke C BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):473.

PMID: 32456633 PMC: 7251830. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05332-0.


Building a tobacco user registry by extracting multiple smoking behaviors from clinical notes.

Palmer E, Hassanpour S, Higgins J, Doherty J, Onega T BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019; 19(1):141.

PMID: 31340796 PMC: 6657102. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0863-3.


Association of Income Disparities with Patient-Reported Healthcare Experience.

Okunrintemi V, Khera R, Spatz E, Salami J, Valero-Elizondo J, Warraich H J Gen Intern Med. 2019; 34(6):884-892.

PMID: 30783877 PMC: 6544715. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-04848-4.


What Contributes to the Activeness of Ethnic Minority Patients with Chronic Illnesses Seeking Allied Health Services? A Cross-Sectional Study in Rural Western China.

Tang S, Dong D, Ji L, Fu H, Feng Z, Bishwajit G Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015; 12(9):11579-93.

PMID: 26389931 PMC: 4586692. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120911579.

References
1.
Coulter A, Jenkinson C . European patients' views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers. Eur J Public Health. 2005; 15(4):355-60. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cki004. View

2.
Lynch S . Cohort and life-course patterns in the relationship between education and health: a hierarchical approach. Demography. 2003; 40(2):309-31. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2003.0016. View

3.
McIsaac W, Goel V, Naylor D . Socio-economic status and visits to physicians by adults in Ontario, Canada. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997; 2(2):94-102. DOI: 10.1177/135581969700200207. View

4.
Bensing J . Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Patient Educ Couns. 2000; 39(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(99)00087-7. View

5.
Contoyannis P, Jones A . Socio-economic status, health and lifestyle. J Health Econ. 2004; 23(5):965-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.02.001. View