» Articles » PMID: 24988902

Comparative Efficacy of Biologics As Monotherapy and in Combination with Methotrexate on Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with an Inadequate Response to Conventional DMARDs--a Systematic Review and Network...

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2014 Jul 4
PMID 24988902
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare biologics as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in terms of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in RA patients with an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs (DMARD-IR).

Methods: With a systematic literature review 17 RCTs were identified that evaluated adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, abatacept, anakinra or tocilizumab. Treatment effects in terms of pain (0-100 mm), patient's global assessment of disease activity (PGA; 0-100 mm), Health Assessment-Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI; 0-3), and the physical component summary (PCS) of the SF36 Health Survey (0-100) at 24 weeks were combined by means of Bayesian network meta-analyses.

Results: With tocilizumab monotherapy, greater improvements in pain (difference = -11.1; (95% Credible Interval -21.3, -0.1)) and PGA (-10.3 (-20.4, 0.8)) were observed than with aTNF monotherapy. Tocilizumab was at least as efficacious as aTNF in HAQ-DI improvements (-0.16; (-0.37, 0.05)). aTNF + MTX (-17.9 (-23.1, -13.0) & -19.1 (-24.2, -14.4)), abatacept + MTX (-23.0 (-47.3, 1. 5) & -13.6 (-28.4, 2.0)) and tocilizumab + MTX (-16.0 (-26.3, -6.3) & -15.1 (-25.1, -5.7)) showed comparable reductions in pain and PGA relative to MTX. Efficacy of anakinra + MTX was much smaller as compared to other biologics. The greatest improvements in HAQ-DI relative to MTX were observed with aTNF + MTX (-0.30 (-0.37, -0.22)) and tocilizumab + MTX (-0.27 (-0.42, -0.12)), followed by abatacept + MTX (-0.21 (-0.37, -0.05)) and anakinra + MTX (-0.11 (-0.26, 0.05)). The improvements in SF36-PCS with abatacept + MTX, aTNF + MTX and tocilizumab + MTX were comparable. There is a >90% probability that aTNF + MTX results in a greater improvement in pain (-12.4), PGA (-16.1) and HAQ-DI (-0.21) than aTNF as monotherapy. Efficacy of tocilizumab + MTX showed comparable improvements in PROs as tocilizumab monotherapy.

Conclusions: Based on a network meta-analysis involving indirect comparison of trial findings, the following observations were made for DMARD-IR patients. In monotherapy, tocilizumab was associated with a greater improvement in pain and self-reported disease activity than aTNF, and was at least as efficacious regarding functional ability. The improvements in PROs with aTNF, abatacept and tocilizumab in combination with MTX were comparable. Improvements in PROs with tocilizumab as monotherapy were similar to that of tocilizumab + MTX, whereas aTNF as monotherapy was likely to be less efficacious than aTNF + MTX.

Citing Articles

Pharmacological pain management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a narrative literature review.

Cox N, Mallen C, Scott I BMC Med. 2025; 23(1):54.

PMID: 39881356 PMC: 11780779. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-03870-0.


Pain management in people with inflammatory arthritis: British Society for Rheumatology guideline scope.

Scott I, Babatunde O, Barker C, Beesley R, Beesley R, Birkinshaw H Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2024; 8(4):rkae128.

PMID: 39563967 PMC: 11573413. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkae128.


Potential Mechanism of Fatigue Induction and Its Management by JAK Inhibitors in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases.

Felis-Giemza A, Massalska M, Roszkowski L, Romanowska-Prochnicka K, Ciechomska M J Inflamm Res. 2023; 16:3949-3965.

PMID: 37706062 PMC: 10497048. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S414739.


Exploring the impact of the national tender system on the use of costly drugs treating rheumatoid arthritis patients in ten rheumatology centers in Norway (2010-2019).

Brkic A, Diamantopoulos A, Hoff M, Haavardsholm E, Fevang B, Brekke L BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):968.

PMID: 37679747 PMC: 10486045. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09975-7.


Inflammasomes: Mechanisms of Action and Involvement in Human Diseases.

Bulte D, Rigamonti C, Romano A, Mortellaro A Cells. 2023; 12(13).

PMID: 37443800 PMC: 10340308. DOI: 10.3390/cells12131766.


References
1.
Smolen J, Beaulieu A, Rubbert-Roth A, Ramos-Remus C, Rovensky J, Alecock E . Effect of interleukin-6 receptor inhibition with tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (OPTION study): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet. 2008; 371(9617):987-97. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60453-5. View

2.
Caldwell D, Ades A, Higgins J . Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ. 2005; 331(7521):897-900. PMC: 1255806. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.331.7521.897. View

3.
Felson D, Anderson J, Boers M, Bombardier C, Chernoff M, Fried B . The American College of Rheumatology preliminary core set of disease activity measures for rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Committee on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Arthritis Rheum. 1993; 36(6):729-40. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780360601. View

4.
Kremer J, Genant H, Moreland L, Russell A, Emery P, Abud-Mendoza C . Effects of abatacept in patients with methotrexate-resistant active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 144(12):865-76. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-12-200606200-00003. View

5.
Wells G, Li T, Maxwell L, Maclean R, Tugwell P . Determining the minimal clinically important differences in activity, fatigue, and sleep quality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007; 34(2):280-9. View