» Articles » PMID: 24983839

Electrocardiographic Differences Between COPD Patients Evaluated for Lung Transplantation with and Without Pulmonary Hypertension

Overview
Journal COPD
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2014 Jul 2
PMID 24983839
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an indicator of poor prognosis in COPD patients; particularly in those with mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥ 40 mm Hg. Electrocardiography (ECG) might be useful for screening of this condition.

Methods: Retrospective study of COPD patients evaluated for lung transplantation in whom we analyzed the 12-lead ECG performed closest to the time of right heart catheterization.

Results: We included 142 patients. PH was present in 90 patients (63%) and 16 (11%) had a mean PAP ≥ 40 mmHg. The PR interval was longer in PH patients (151 (29) versus 139 (22) ms, p = 0.01) and T wave axis had a left shift (56.9 (32) versus 68.7 (19) degrees, p = 0.006). PR interval was longer (178.5 (35) versus 142.2 (23) ms, p = 0.001), T wave axis had a leftward deflection (63.6 (24) versus 42.8 (46) degrees, p = 0.005) and S wave in lead I was larger (0.19 (0.13) versus 0.12 (0.12) mV, p = 0.03) in patients with mean PAP ≥ 40 mmHg. A PR interval > 137 ms and S wave in DI > 0.02 mV had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 59.5% to identify COPD patients with a mean PAP ≥ 40 mmHg.

Conclusion: There are significant ECG differences between advanced COPD patients with and without PH; however the ECG is an inadequate tool to differentiate between the groups. A prolonged PR interval suggests the presence of severe PH.

Citing Articles

The Diagnostic Accuracy of an Electrocardiogram in Pulmonary Hypertension and the Role of "R V1, V2 + S I, aVL - S V1".

Ley L, Wiedenroth C, Guth S, Gold C, Yogeswaran A, Ghofrani H J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768536 PMC: 11679519. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247613.


The Incidence and Prevalence of Pulmonary Hypertension in the COPD Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zhang L, Liu Y, Zhao S, Wang Z, Zhang M, Zhang S Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022; 17:1365-1379.

PMID: 35711174 PMC: 9196913. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S359873.


Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Kumar W, Shaikh W, Kp S, Bhatty S, Hassan S Cureus. 2022; 13(12):e20820.

PMID: 35141077 PMC: 8799956. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20820.


Electrocardiographic changes in Emphysema.

Gupta P, Jain H, Gill M, Bharaj G, Khalid N, Chaudhry W World J Cardiol. 2021; 13(10):533-545.

PMID: 34754398 PMC: 8554360. DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i10.533.


Evaluating of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width, Comorbidities and Electrocardiographic Ratios as Predictors of Prognosis in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension.

Baltazares-Lipp M, Aguilera-Velasco A, Aquino-Galvez A, Velazquez-Cruz R, Hernandez-Zenteno R, Alvarado-Vasquez N Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(7).

PMID: 34359380 PMC: 8305029. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071297.


References
1.
Pfeufer A, van Noord C, Marciante K, Arking D, Larson M, Smith A . Genome-wide association study of PR interval. Nat Genet. 2010; 42(2):153-9. PMC: 2850197. DOI: 10.1038/ng.517. View

2.
Spodick D . Electrocardiographic studies in pulmonary disease. II. Establishment of criteria for the electrocardiographic inference of diffuse lung diseases. Circulation. 1959; 20:1073-4. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.20.6.1073. View

3.
Andersen C, Mellemkjaer S, Nielsen-Kudsk J, Sonderskov L, Laursen B, Simonsen U . Echocardiographic screening for pulmonary hypertension in stable COPD out-patients and NT-proBNP as a rule-out test. COPD. 2012; 9(5):505-12. DOI: 10.3109/15412555.2012.695818. View

4.
Scott R . The electrocardiogram in pulmonary emphysema and chronic cor pulmonale. Am Heart J. 1961; 61:843-5. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(61)90472-0. View

5.
Cuttica M, Kalhan R, Shlobin O, Ahmad S, Gladwin M, Machado R . Categorization and impact of pulmonary hypertension in patients with advanced COPD. Respir Med. 2010; 104(12):1877-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.05.009. View