Effect of Empathy Trait on Attention to Various Facial Expressions: Evidence from N170 and Late Positive Potential (LPP)

Overview

Journal J Physiol Anthropol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2014 Jul 1

PMID 24975115

Citations 13

Authors

Damee Choi

Takayuki Nishimura

Midori Motoi

Yuka Egashira

Riko Matsumoto

Shigeki Watanuki

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The present study sought to clarify the relationship between empathy trait and attention responses to happy, angry, surprised, afraid, and sad facial expressions. As indices of attention, we recorded event-related potentials (ERP) and focused on N170 and late positive potential (LPP) components.

Methods: Twenty-two participants (12 males, 10 females) discriminated facial expressions (happy, angry, surprised, afraid, and sad) from emotionally neutral faces under an oddball paradigm. The empathy trait of participants was measured using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI, J Pers Soc Psychol 44:113-126, 1983).

Results: Participants with higher IRI scores showed: 1) more negative amplitude of N170 (140 to 200 ms) in the right posterior temporal area elicited by happy, angry, surprised, and afraid faces; 2) more positive amplitude of early LPP (300 to 600 ms) in the parietal area elicited in response to angry and afraid faces; and 3) more positive amplitude of late LPP (600 to 800 ms) in the frontal area elicited in response to happy, angry, surprised, afraid, and sad faces, compared to participants with lower IRI scores.

Conclusions: These results suggest that individuals with high empathy pay attention to various facial expressions more than those with low empathy, from very-early stage (reflected in N170) to late-stage (reflected in LPP) processing of faces.

Citing Articles

Neural dynamics of personality trait perception and interaction preferences.

Weiss M, Paelecke M, Mussel P, Hein G Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30455.

PMID: 39668166 PMC: 11638252. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76423-9.

Empathy enhances decoding accuracy of human neurophysiological responses to emotional facial expressions of humans and dogs.

Kujala M, Parkkonen L, Kujala J Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 39508559 PMC: 11587893. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae082.

Neuronal Correlates of Empathy: A Systematic Review of Event-Related Potentials Studies in Perceptual Tasks.

Almeida R, Prata C, Pereira M, Barbosa F, Ferreira-Santos F Brain Sci. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38790482 PMC: 11119458. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050504.

Pleasure of paying when using mobile payment: Evidence from EEG studies.

Wang M, Ling A, He Y, Tan Y, Zhang L, Chang Z Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1004068.

PMID: 36389456 PMC: 9640944. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004068.

The Effects of Dynamic and Static Emotional Facial Expressions of Humans and Their Avatars on the EEG: An ERP and ERD/ERS Study.

Sollfrank T, Kohnen O, Hilfiker P, Kegel L, Jokeit H, Brugger P Front Neurosci. 2021; 15:651044.

PMID: 33967681 PMC: 8100234. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.651044.

References

Weinberg A, Hilgard J, Bartholow B, Hajcak G . Emotional targets: evaluative categorization as a function of context and content. Int J Psychophysiol. 2012; 84(2):149-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.01.023. View

Soria Bauser D, Thoma P, Suchan B . Turn to me: electrophysiological correlates of frontal vs. averted view face and body processing are associated with trait empathy. Front Integr Neurosci. 2012; 6:106. PMC: 3510484. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2012.00106. View

Neta M, Norris C, Whalen P . Corrugator muscle responses are associated with individual differences in positivity-negativity bias. Emotion. 2009; 9(5):640-8. PMC: 2825576. DOI: 10.1037/a0016819. View

Towle V, Bolanos J, Suarez D, Tan K, Grzeszczuk R, Levin D . The spatial location of EEG electrodes: locating the best-fitting sphere relative to cortical anatomy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993; 86(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90061-y. View

Kramer U, Mohammadi B, Donamayor N, Samii A, Munte T . Emotional and cognitive aspects of empathy and their relation to social cognition--an fMRI-study. Brain Res. 2009; 1311:110-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.043. View

Ekman P, Friesen W . Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1971; 17(2):124-9. DOI: 10.1037/h0030377. View

Taylor M, McCarthy G, Saliba E, DEGIOVANNI E . ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 110(5):910-5. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00006-1. View

Herrmann M, Aranda D, Ellgring H, Mueller T, Strik W, Heidrich A . Face-specific event-related potential in humans is independent from facial expression. Int J Psychophysiol. 2002; 45(3):241-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(02)00033-8. View

Hajcak G, MacNamara A, Olvet D . Event-related potentials, emotion, and emotion regulation: an integrative review. Dev Neuropsychol. 2010; 35(2):129-55. DOI: 10.1080/87565640903526504. View

10.

Holmes A, Vuilleumier P, Eimer M . The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003; 16(2):174-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00268-9. View

11.

Schulte-Ruther M, Markowitsch H, Fink G, Piefke M . Mirror neuron and theory of mind mechanisms involved in face-to-face interactions: a functional magnetic resonance imaging approach to empathy. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007; 19(8):1354-72. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1354. View

12.

Eimer M, Holmes A, McGlone F . The role of spatial attention in the processing of facial expression: an ERP study of rapid brain responses to six basic emotions. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2003; 3(2):97-110. DOI: 10.3758/cabn.3.2.97. View

13.

Hauswald A, Schulz H, Iordanov T, Kissler J . ERP dynamics underlying successful directed forgetting of neutral but not negative pictures. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2010; 6(4):450-9. PMC: 3150854. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsq061. View

14.

Campanella S, Hanoteau C, Depy D, Rossion B, Bruyer R, Crommelinck M . Right N170 modulation in a face discrimination task: an account for categorical perception of familiar faces. Psychophysiology. 2000; 37(6):796-806. View

15.

Bentin S, Allison T, Puce A, Perez E, McCarthy G . Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010; 8(6):551-565. PMC: 2927138. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551. View

16.

Olofsson J, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J . Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biol Psychol. 2008; 77(3):247-65. PMC: 2443061. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006. View

17.

Choi D, Watanuki S . Effect of empathy trait on attention to faces: an event-related potential (ERP) study. J Physiol Anthropol. 2014; 33:4. PMC: 3904693. DOI: 10.1186/1880-6805-33-4. View

18.

Jabbi M, Swart M, Keysers C . Empathy for positive and negative emotions in the gustatory cortex. Neuroimage. 2006; 34(4):1744-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.032. View

19.

Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S . The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004; 34(2):163-75. DOI: 10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00. View

20.

Zhang D, Luo W, Luo Y . Single-trial ERP analysis reveals facial expression category in a three-stage scheme. Brain Res. 2013; 1512:78-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.044. View