» Articles » PMID: 24974196

Perceptions of Quality in Primary Health Care: Perspectives of Patients and Professionals Based on Focus Group Discussions

Overview
Journal BMC Fam Pract
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Jun 30
PMID 24974196
Citations 40
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The EUprimecare project-team assessed the perception of primary health care (PHC) professionals and patients on quality of organization of PHC systems in the participating countries: Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania and Spain. This article presents the aggregated opinions, expectations and priorities of patients and professionals along some main dimensions of quality in primary health care, such as access, equity, appropriateness and patient- centeredness.

Methods: The focus group technique was applied in the study as a qualitative research method for exploration of attitudes regarding the health care system and health service. Discussions were addressing the topics of: general aspects of quality in primary health care; possibilities to receive/provide PHC services based on both parties needs; determinant factors of accessibility to PHC services; patient centeredness. The data sets collected during the focus group discussions were evaluated using the method of thematic analysis.

Results: There were 14 focus groups in total: a professional and a patient group in each of the seven partner countries. Findings of the thematic analysis were summarized along the following dimensions: access and equity, appropriateness (coordination, continuity, competency and comprehensiveness) and patient centeredness.

Conclusions: This study shows perceptions and views of patients in interaction with PHC and opinion of professionals working in PHC. It serves as source of criteria with relevance to everyday practice and experience. The criteria mentioned by patients and by health care professionals which were considered determining factors of the quality in primary care were quite similar among the investigated countries. However, the perception and the level of tolerance regarding some of the criteria differed among EUprimecare countries. Among these dissimilar criteria we especially note the gate-keeping role of GPs, the importance of nurses' competency and the acceptance of waiting times. The impact of waiting time on patient satisfaction is obvious; the influence of equity and access to PHC services are more dependent on the equal distribution of settings and doctors in urban and rural area. Foreseen shortage of doctors is expected to have a substantial influence on patient satisfaction in the near future.

Citing Articles

Perspectives of healthcare providers on osteoporosis, falls and fracture risk: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Cho C, Bak G, Sumpton D, Richards B, Sherrington C Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):90.

PMID: 39313605 PMC: 11420259. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01446-8.


Patients values regarding primary health care: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence.

Pratiwi A, Padmawati R, Mulyanto J, Willems D BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):400.

PMID: 37098522 PMC: 10131468. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09394-8.


Seeking lifestyle counselling at primary health care centres: a cross-sectional study in the Swedish population.

Lundin Gurne F, Svensson P, Bjorkman I, Liden E, Jakobsson S BMC Prim Care. 2023; 24(1):74.

PMID: 36941550 PMC: 10026786. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02035-3.


Differences in Perception of Healthcare Management between Patients and Professionals.

Moya D, Guilabert M, Manzanera R, Galvez G, Torres M, Lopez-Pineda A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(5).

PMID: 36900854 PMC: 10001773. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20053842.


Danish general practitioners as gatekeepers for gynaecological patients in regions with different density of resident specialists in gynaecology: in which situations and to whom do they refer? A cross-sectional study.

Laschke A, Blaakaer J, Jensen C, Larsen M Scand J Prim Health Care. 2023; 41(1):52-60.

PMID: 36633427 PMC: 10088933. DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2165085.


References
1.
Flodgren G, Pomey M, Taber S, Eccles M . Effectiveness of external inspection of compliance with standards in improving healthcare organisation behaviour, healthcare professional behaviour or patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (11):CD008992. PMC: 4164461. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008992.pub2. View

2.
JUNG H, Wensing M, Olesen F, Grol R . Comparison of patients' and general practitioners' evaluations of general practice care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11(4):315-9. PMC: 1758010. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.315. View

3.
Tomlin Z, Humphrey C, Rogers S . General practitioners' perceptions of effective health care. BMJ. 1999; 318(7197):1532-5. PMC: 27897. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1532. View

4.
Kelley E, Arispe I, Holmes J . Beyond the initial indicators: lessons from the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project and the US National Healthcare Quality Report. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006; 18 Suppl 1:45-51. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl027. View

5.
Starfield B . New paradigms for quality in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2001; 51(465):303-9. PMC: 1313982. View