» Articles » PMID: 24971347

Considering Angle Selection when Using Ultrasound Electrode Displacement Elastography to Evaluate Radiofrequency Ablation of Tissues

Overview
Journal Biomed Res Int
Publisher Wiley
Date 2014 Jun 28
PMID 24971347
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment to thermally destroy tumors. Ultrasound-based electrode-displacement elastography is an emerging technique for evaluating the region of RFA-induced lesions. The angle between the imaging probe and the RFA electrode can influence electrode-displacement elastography when visualizing the ablation zone. We explored the angle effect on electrode-displacement elastography to measure the ablation zone. Phantoms embedded with meatballs were fabricated and then ablated using an RFA system to simulate RFA-induced lesions. For each phantom, a commercial ultrasound scanner with a 7.5 MHz linear probe was used to acquire raw image data at different angles, ranging from 30° to 90° at increments of 10°, to construct electrode-displacement images and facilitate comparisons with tissue section images. The results revealed that the ablation regions detected using electrode-displacement elastography were highly correlated with those from tissue section images when the angle was between 30° and 60°. However, the boundaries of lesions were difficult to distinguish, when the angle was larger than 60°. The experimental findings suggest that angle selection should be considered to achieve reliable electrode-displacement elastography to describe ablation zones.

References
1.
Varghese T, Techavipoo U, Liu W, Zagzebski J, Chen Q, Frank G . Elastographic measurement of the area and volume of thermal lesions resulting from radiofrequency ablation: pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181(3):701-7. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810701. View

2.
Mast T, Pucke D, Subramanian S, Bowlus W, Rudich S, Buell J . Ultrasound monitoring of in vitro radio frequency ablation by echo decorrelation imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2008; 27(12):1685-97. DOI: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.12.1685. View

3.
Bharat S, Varghese T, Madsen E, Zagzebski J . Radio-frequency ablation electrode displacement elastography: a phantom study. Med Phys. 2008; 35(6):2432-42. PMC: 2673634. DOI: 10.1118/1.2919763. View

4.
Ophir J, Cespedes I, Ponnekanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X . Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1991; 13(2):111-34. DOI: 10.1177/016173469101300201. View

5.
El-Serag H, Marrero J, Rudolph L, Reddy K . Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134(6):1752-63. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.090. View