Management of Complicated and Uncomplicated Acute Type B Dissection. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The management of acute type B dissection represents a clinical challenge. We undertook a systematic review of the available literature regarding medical, surgical and endovascular treatments of acute type B aortic dissection and combined the eligible studies into a meta-analysis.
Methods: An extensive electronic health database search was performed on all articles published from January 2006 up to November 2013 describing the management of acute type B aortic dissection. Studies including less than 15 patients were excluded.
Results: ACUTE COMPLICATED TYPE B DISSECTION: overall, 2,531 patients were treated with endovascular repair (TEVAR) and the pooled rate for 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 7.3%. The pooled estimates for cerebrovascular events, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and total neurologic events were 3.9%, 3.1% and 7.3%, respectively. A total of 1,276 patients underwent open surgical repair and the pooled rate for 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 19.0%. The pooled rate for cerebrovascular events was 6.8%, for SCI 3.3% and for total neurologic complications 9.8%. Acute uncomplicated type B dissection: outcome of 2,347 patients who underwent conservative medical management were analyzed. The pooled 30-day/in-hospital mortality rate was 2.4%. The pooled rate for cerebrovascular events was 1%, for SCI 0.8% and for overall neurologic complications 2%.
Conclusions: Endovascular repair provides a superior 30-day/in-hospital survival for acute complicated type B aortic dissection compared to surgical aortic reconstruction. However, open repair still has a significant role as endovascular repair is not applicable in all patients and there remains concerns regarding the durability of this technique. TEVAR seems to have a more favorable outcome regarding aortic remodeling and the aortic-specific survival rate when compared with medical therapy alone. Randomized controlled trials focusing on the prognostic factors of early and late complications in uncomplicated type B dissections are needed.
Salvaging From Limb Amputation in an Acute Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection Patient.
Tuan P, Quang N, Hung P, Than L Med Arch. 2025; 78(4):313-316.
PMID: 39981155 PMC: 11838834. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2024.78.313-316.
Mechanisms of aortic dissection: From pathological changes to experimental and models.
Rolf-Pissarczyk M, Schussnig R, Fries T, Fleischmann D, Elefteriades J, Humphrey J Prog Mater Sci. 2025; 150.
PMID: 39830801 PMC: 11737592. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101363.
Narrow true lumen favors future complication even in small diameter of type B aortic dissection.
Nakamura K, Sho R, Kobayashi K, Nakai S, Ishizawa A, Watanabe D J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(10):6357-6367.
PMID: 39552903 PMC: 11565344. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-864.
Nakamura K, Kobayashi K, Nakai S, Sho R, Arai S, Ishizawa A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1442800.
PMID: 39529972 PMC: 11550929. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1442800.
Complicated type B aortic dissection in a pregnant woman with Marfan syndrome.
Zagzoog M, Crawford S, Davaine J J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2024; 10(5):101561.
PMID: 39188689 PMC: 11345379. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101561.