» Articles » PMID: 24961727

Research in Digital Mammography and Tomosynthesis at the University of Toronto

Overview
Date 2014 Jun 26
PMID 24961727
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There have been major advances in the field of breast cancer imaging since the early 1970s, both in technological improvements and in the use of the methods of medical physics and image analysis to optimize image quality. The introduction of digital mammography in 2000 provided a marked improvement in imaging of dense breasts. In addition, it became possible to produce tomographic and functional images on modified digital mammography systems. Digital imaging also greatly facilitated the extraction of quantitative information from images. My laboratory has been fortunate in being able to participate in some of these exciting developments. I will highlight some of the areas of our research interest which include modeling of the image formation process, development of high-resolution X-ray detectors for digital mammography and investigating new methods for analyzing image quality. I will also describe our more recent work on developing new applications of digital mammography including tomosynthesis, contrast-enhanced mammography, and measurement of breast density. Finally, I will point to a new area for our research--the application of the techniques of medical imaging to making pathology more quantitative to contribute to use of biomarkers for better characterizing breast cancer and directing therapeutic decisions.

Citing Articles

Beyond the mammography debate: a moderate perspective.

Kaniklidis C Curr Oncol. 2015; 22(3):220-9.

PMID: 26089721 PMC: 4462532. DOI: 10.3747/co.22.2585.

References
1.
BURGER G . The perceptibility of details in roentgen examinations of the lung. Acta Radiol (Stockh). 1949; 31(3):193-222. DOI: 10.3109/00016924909176956. View

2.
Chang C, Nesbit D, Fisher D, Fritz S, Dwyer 3rd S, Templeton A . Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982; 138(3):553-8. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.138.3.553. View

3.
Heywang-Kobrunner S . Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Invest Radiol. 1994; 29(1):94-104. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199401000-00019. View

4.
Shepherd J, Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Genant H, Cummings S . Measurement of breast density with dual X-ray absorptiometry: feasibility. Radiology. 2002; 223(2):554-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2232010482. View

5.
Nishikawa R, Yaffe M . Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems. Med Phys. 1985; 12(1):32-9. DOI: 10.1118/1.595781. View