Standardized Testing with Chlorhexidine in Perioperative Allergy--a Large Single-centre Evaluation
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Perioperative allergic reactions to chlorhexidine are often severe and easily overlooked. Although rare, the prevalence remains unknown. Correct diagnosis is crucial, but no validated provocation model exists, and other diagnostic tests have never been evaluated. The aims were to estimate (i) the prevalence of chlorhexidine allergy in perioperative allergy and (ii) the specificity and sensitivity for diagnostic tests for chlorhexidine allergy.
Methods: We included all patients investigated for suspected perioperative allergic reactions in the Danish Anaesthesia Allergy Centre during 2004-2012. The following tests were performed: specific IgE (Immunocap® ; Phadia AB, Sweden), histamine release test (HR) (RefLab ApS, Denmark), skin prick test (SPT) and intradermal test (IDT). Positivity criteria were as follows: specific IgE >0.35 kUA/l; HR class 1-12; SPT mean wheal diameter ≥3 mm; IDT mean wheal diameter ≥ twice the diameter of negative control. Chlorhexidine allergy was post hoc defined as a relevant clinical reaction to chlorhexidine combined with two or more positive tests. Based on this definition, sensitivity and specificity were estimated for each test.
Results: In total, 22 of 228 patients (9.6%) met the definition of allergy to chlorhexidine. Estimated sensitivity and specificity were as follows: specific IgE (sensitivity 100% and specificity 97%), HR (sensitivity 55% and specificity 99%), SPT (sensitivity 95% and specificity 97%) and IDT (sensitivity 68% and specificity 100%).
Conclusions: In patients investigated for suspected perioperative allergic reactions, 9.6% were diagnosed with allergy to chlorhexidine. Using our definition of chlorhexidine allergy, the highest combined estimated sensitivity and specificity was found for specific IgE and SPT.
Stability of diluted chlorhexidine for skin testing in drug allergy evaluations.
Shah D, Cojuc-Konigsberg G, Brown S, Chiarella S, Volcheck G, Kita H J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2025; 4(1):100372.
PMID: 39802397 PMC: 11719288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100372.
Anderson B, Tanenbaum Z, Michael A, Owen S J Surg Case Rep. 2024; 2024(7):rjae103.
PMID: 38974088 PMC: 11226778. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjae103.
In vitro anti-biofilm properties of the peel of fruite wall of acorn against Streptococcus mutans.
Chavak Z, Mahdian N, Pakzad I, Soltani M, Badakhsh B, Ghafourian S GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2023; 18:Doc23.
PMID: 37829251 PMC: 10566014. DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000449.
Tools for Etiologic Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Allergic Conditions.
Rodriguez-Perez R, De Las Vecillas L, Cabanas R, Bellon T Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(16).
PMID: 37628756 PMC: 10454098. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241612577.
Ebo D, Vlaeminck N, van der Poorten M, Elst J, Toscano A, Van Gasse A World Allergy Organ J. 2023; 16(3):100759.
PMID: 37025251 PMC: 10070178. DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100759.