» Articles » PMID: 24957732

Monitoring Protein Fouling on Polymeric Membranes Using Ultrasonic Frequency-domain Reflectometry

Overview
Date 2014 Jun 25
PMID 24957732
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Novel signal-processing protocols were used to extend the in situ sensitivity of ultrasonic frequency-domain reflectometry (UFDR) for real-time monitoring of microfiltration (MF) membrane fouling during protein purification. Different commercial membrane materials, with a nominal pore size of 0.2 µm, were challenged using bovine serum albumin (BSA) and amylase as model proteins. Fouling induced by these proteins was observed in flat-sheet membrane filtration cells operating in a laminar cross-flow regime. The detection of membrane-associated proteins using UFDR was determined by applying rigorous statistical methodology to reflection spectra of ultrasonic signals obtained during membrane fouling. Data suggest that the total power reflected from membrane surfaces changes in response to protein fouling at concentrations as low as 14 μg/cm2, and results indicate that ultrasonic spectra can be leveraged to detect and monitor protein fouling on commercial MF membranes.

Citing Articles

Membrane fouling monitoring by 3ω sensing.

Jorgensen M, Paulsen F, Bentien A, Kjul A, Poulsen M, Mikkelsen L Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):15237.

PMID: 37709852 PMC: 10502093. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-42337-1.


Monitoring of Particulate Fouling Potential of Feed Water with Spectroscopic Measurements.

Weirich M, Antonyuk S Membranes (Basel). 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37505030 PMC: 10385396. DOI: 10.3390/membranes13070664.


Quantifying Charge Effects on Fouling Layer Strength and (Ir)Removability during Cross-Flow Microfiltration.

Jorgensen M, Mattsson T Membranes (Basel). 2021; 11(1).

PMID: 33401452 PMC: 7824541. DOI: 10.3390/membranes11010028.


A method for rapid quantitative assessment of biofilms with biomolecular staining and image analysis.

Larimer C, Winder E, Jeters R, Prowant M, Nettleship I, Addleman R Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015; 408(3):999-1008.

PMID: 26643074 PMC: 4709385. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-9195-z.

References
1.
Syedain Z, Bohonak D, Zydney A . Protein fouling of virus filtration membranes: effects of membrane orientation and operating conditions. Biotechnol Prog. 2006; 22(4):1163-9. DOI: 10.1021/bp050350v. View

2.
Palacio L, Ho C, Zydney A . Application of a pore-blockage--cake-filtration model to protein fouling during microfiltration. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002; 79(3):260-70. DOI: 10.1002/bit.10283. View

3.
Sanderson R, Li J, Hallbauer D, Sikder S . Fourier wavelets from ultrasonic spectra: a new approach for detecting the onset of fouling during microfiltration of paper mill effluent. Environ Sci Technol. 2005; 39(18):7299-305. DOI: 10.1021/es050414y. View

4.
Zydney A, Ho C . Effect of membrane morphology on system capacity during normal flow microfiltration. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003; 83(5):537-43. DOI: 10.1002/bit.10699. View

5.
Kelly S, Zydney A . Protein fouling during microfiltration: comparative behavior of different model proteins. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1997; 55(1):91-100. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970705)55:1<91::AID-BIT11>3.0.CO;2-6. View