CT-planned Internal Mammary Node Radiotherapy in the DBCG-IMN Study: Benefit Versus Potentially Harmful Effects
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: The DBCG-IMN is a nationwide population-based cohort study on the effect of internal mammary node radiotherapy (IMN-RT) in patients with node positive early breast cancer. Due to the risk of RT-induced heart disease, only patients with right-sided breast cancer received IMN-RT, whereas patients with left-sided breast cancer did not. At seven-year median follow-up, a 3% gain in overall survival with IMN-RT has been reported. This study estimates IMN doses and doses to organs at risk (OAR) in patients from the DBCG-IMN. Numbers needed to harm (NNH) if patients with left-sided breast cancer had received IMN-RT are compared to the number needed to treat (NNT).
Material And Methods: Ten percent of CT-guided treatment plans from the DBCG-IMN patients were selected randomly. IMNs and OAR were contoured in 68 planning CT scans. Dose distributions were re-calculated. IMNs and OAR dose estimates were compared in right-sided versus left-sided breast cancer patients. In six left-sided patients, IMN-RT was simulated, and OAR doses were compared to those in the original plan. The NNH resulting from the change in mean heart dose (MHD) was calculated using a published model for risk of RT-related ischemic heart death.
Results: In original plans, the absolute difference between right- and left-sided V90% to the IMNs was 38.0% [95% confidence interval (5.5%; 70.5%), p < 0.05]. Heart doses were higher in left-sided plans. With IMN-RT simulation without regard to OAR constraints, MHD increased 4.8 Gy (0.9 Gy; 8.7 Gy), p < 0.05. Resulting NNHs from ischemic heart death were consistently larger than the NNT with IMN-RT.
Conclusion: Refraining from IMN-RT on the left side may have spared some ischemic heart deaths. Assuming left-sided patients benefit as much from IMN-RT as right-sided patients, the benefits from IMN-RT outweigh the costs in terms of ischemic heart death.
Nielsen A, Thorsen L, Ozcan D, Matthiessen L, Maae E, Milo M Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025; 49():101160.
PMID: 39810969 PMC: 11732476. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101160.
B S, Backianathan S, Rafic K M, T J, Susan Varghese S, S P Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024; 25(9):3301-3310.
PMID: 39342610 PMC: 11700318. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.9.3301.
Proton therapy for breast cancer: Reducing toxicity.
Qiao K, Wei Y, Tao C, Zhu J, Yuan S Thorac Cancer. 2024; 15(30):2156-2165.
PMID: 39275876 PMC: 11496198. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15451.
Nielsen A, Spejlborg H, Lutz C, Poulsen P, Offersen B Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023; 27:100470.
PMID: 37533551 PMC: 10393587. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100470.
Garda A, Hunzeker A, Michel A, Fattahi S, Shiraishi S, Remmes N Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 7(3):100901.
PMID: 35647397 PMC: 9133394. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100901.