» Articles » PMID: 24956523

Gas-Foamed Scaffold Gradients for Combinatorial Screening in 3D

Overview
Date 2014 Jun 24
PMID 24956523
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current methods for screening cell-material interactions typically utilize a two-dimensional (2D) culture format where cells are cultured on flat surfaces. However, there is a need for combinatorial and high-throughput screening methods to systematically screen cell-biomaterial interactions in three-dimensional (3D) tissue scaffolds for tissue engineering. Previously, we developed a two-syringe pump approach for making 3D scaffold gradients for use in combinatorial screening of salt-leached scaffolds. Herein, we demonstrate that the two-syringe pump approach can also be used to create scaffold gradients using a gas-foaming approach. Macroporous foams prepared by a gas-foaming technique are commonly used for fabrication of tissue engineering scaffolds due to their high interconnectivity and good mechanical properties. Gas-foamed scaffold gradient libraries were fabricated from two biodegradable tyrosine-derived polycarbonates: poly(desaminotyrosyl-tyrosine ethyl ester carbonate) (pDTEc) and poly(desaminotyrosyl-tyrosine octyl ester carbonate) (pDTOc). The composition of the libraries was assessed with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and showed that pDTEc/pDTOc gas-foamed scaffold gradients could be repeatably fabricated. Scanning electron microscopy showed that scaffold morphology was similar between the pDTEc-rich ends and the pDTOc-rich ends of the gradient. These results introduce a method for fabricating gas-foamed polymer scaffold gradients that can be used for combinatorial screening of cell-material interactions in 3D.

Citing Articles

Development of a Workflow to Engineer Tailored Microparticles Via Inkjet Printing.

Winter C, Zettl M, Mantanus J, Hadjittofis E, Leitinger G, Kolb D Pharm Res. 2022; 40(1):281-294.

PMID: 36380170 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-022-03426-4.


3D-printed gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)/silanated silica scaffold assisted by two-stage cooling system for hard tissue regeneration.

Choi E, Kim D, Kang D, Yang G, Jung B, Yeo M Regen Biomater. 2021; 8(2):rbab001.

PMID: 33738115 PMC: 7955716. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbab001.


Current status of three-dimensional printing inks for soft tissue regeneration.

Kim J, Kim S, Jung Y Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019; 13(6):636-646.

PMID: 30603445 PMC: 6170864. DOI: 10.1007/s13770-016-0125-8.


Research trends in biomimetic medical materials for tissue engineering: 3D bioprinting, surface modification, nano/micro-technology and clinical aspects in tissue engineering of cartilage and bone.

Chen C, Bang S, Cho Y, Lee S, Lee I, Zhang S Biomater Res. 2016; 20:10.

PMID: 27148455 PMC: 4855474. DOI: 10.1186/s40824-016-0057-3.


Cell-laden poly(ɛ-caprolactone)/alginate hybrid scaffolds fabricated by an aerosol cross-linking process for obtaining homogeneous cell distribution: fabrication, seeding efficiency, and cell proliferation and distribution.

Lee H, Ahn S, Bonassar L, Chun W, Kim G Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2013; 19(10):784-93.

PMID: 23469894 PMC: 3751369. DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2012.0651.

References
1.
Samavedi S, Horton C, Guelcher S, Goldstein A, Whittington A . Fabrication of a model continuously graded co-electrospun mesh for regeneration of the ligament-bone interface. Acta Biomater. 2011; 7(12):4131-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.008. View

2.
Ertel S, Kohn J . Evaluation of a series of tyrosine-derived polycarbonates as degradable biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1994; 28(8):919-30. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820280811. View

3.
Mei Y, Saha K, Bogatyrev S, Yang J, Hook A, Kalcioglu Z . Combinatorial development of biomaterials for clonal growth of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Mater. 2010; 9(9):768-78. PMC: 3388774. DOI: 10.1038/nmat2812. View

4.
Lin N, Lin-Gibson S . Osteoblast response to dimethacrylate composites varying in composition, conversion and roughness using a combinatorial approach. Biomaterials. 2009; 30(27):4480-7. PMC: 2758032. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.019. View

5.
Abbott A . Cell culture: biology's new dimension. Nature. 2003; 424(6951):870-2. DOI: 10.1038/424870a. View