» Articles » PMID: 24954484

The Influence of Hip Rotation on Femoral Offset in Plain Radiographs

Overview
Journal Acta Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2014 Jun 24
PMID 24954484
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Adequate restoration of femoral offset (FO) is critical for successful outcome after hip arthroplasty or fixation of hip fracture. Previous studies have identified that hip rotation influences the projected femoral offset (FOP) on plain anteroposterior (AP) radiographs, but the precise effect of rotation is unknown.

Patients And Methods: We developed a novel method of assessing rotation-corrected femoral offset (FORC), tested its clinical application in 222 AP hip radiographs following proximal femoral nailing, and validated it in 25 cases with corresponding computed tomography (CT) scans.

Results: The mean FORC was 57 (29-93) mm, which differed significantly (p < 0.001) from the mean FOP 49 (22-65) mm and from the mean femoral offset determined by the standard method: 49 (23-66) mm. FORC correlated closely with femoral offset assessed by CT (FOCT); the Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.88-0.97). The intraclass correlation coefficient for the assessment of FORC by AP hip radiographs correlating the repeated measurements of 1 observer and of 2 independent blinded observers was 1.0 and 1.0, respectively.

Interpretation: Hip rotation affects the FOP on plain AP radiographs of the hip in a predictable way and should be adequately accounted for.

Citing Articles

Change in Femoral Offset after Closed Reduction and Dynamic Hip Screw Osteosynthesis Via Lateral Approach in Patients with Medial Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis.

Meier M, Seitz M, Saul D, Gera R, Roch P, Jackle K Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(12):3118-3128.

PMID: 39444173 PMC: 11608787. DOI: 10.1111/os.14220.


A framework for three-dimensional statistical shape modeling of the proximal femur in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.

Johnson L, Mozingo J, Atkins P, Schwab S, Morris A, Elhabian S Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024; .

PMID: 39377856 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03272-2.


Radiological assessment of hip disease in children with cerebral palsy: development of a core measurement set.

Joseph P, Khattak M, Masudi S, Minta L, Perry D Bone Jt Open. 2023; 4(11):825-831.

PMID: 37909150 PMC: 10618048. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.411.BJO-2023-0060.R1.


Comparison between Hip Internal Rotation Assistive Device and Conventional Radiograph Positioning: An Experimental Study.

Sirithiantong T, Sukhapanon T, Cheewatanakornkul R Malays Orthop J. 2023; 16(3):6-10.

PMID: 36589373 PMC: 9791903. DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.2211.002.


Femoral neck shaft angle measurement on plain radiography: is standing or supine radiograph a reliable template for the contralateral femur?.

Haddad B, Hamdan M, Al Nawaiseh M, Aldowekat O, Alshrouf M, Karam A BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):1092.

PMID: 36514028 PMC: 9749307. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06071-5.


References
1.
Dunn D . Anteversion of the neck of the femur; a method of measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1952; 34-B(2):181-6. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.34B2.181. View

2.
Maloney W, Keeney J . Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(4 Suppl 1):108-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.018. View

3.
McGrory B, Morrey B, Cahalan T, An K, Cabanela M . Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77(6):865-9. View

4.
Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Savolainen V, Michelsson O, Hirvensalo E . Femoral shaft medialisation and neck-shaft angle in unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 2004; 28(6):347-53. PMC: 3456909. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0590-x. View

5.
Matsushita A, Nakashima Y, Jingushi S, Yamamoto T, Kuraoka A, Iwamoto Y . Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 24(4):646-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.008. View