» Articles » PMID: 24954166

Biased Agonism of the μ-opioid Receptor by TRV130 Increases Analgesia and Reduces On-target Adverse Effects Versus Morphine: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers

Overview
Journal Pain
Specialties Neurology
Psychiatry
Date 2014 Jun 24
PMID 24954166
Citations 126
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Opioids provide powerful analgesia but also efficacy-limiting adverse effects, including severe nausea, vomiting, and respiratory depression, by activating μ-opioid receptors. Preclinical models suggest that differential activation of signaling pathways downstream of these receptors dissociates analgesia from adverse effects; however, this has not yet translated to a treatment with an improved therapeutic index. Thirty healthy men received single intravenous injections of the biased ligand TRV130 (1.5, 3, or 4.5mg), placebo, or morphine (10mg) in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Primary objectives were to measure safety and tolerability (adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiography, clinical laboratory values), and analgesia (cold pain test) versus placebo. Other measures included respiratory drive (minute volume after induced hypercapnia), subjective drug effects, and pharmacokinetics. Compared to morphine, TRV130 (3, 4.5mg) elicited higher peak analgesia (105, 116 seconds latency vs 75 seconds for morphine, P<.02), with faster onset and similar duration of action. More subjects doubled latency or achieved maximum latency (180 seconds) with TRV130 (3, 4.5mg). Respiratory drive reduction was greater after morphine than any TRV130 dose (-15.9 for morphine versus -7.3, -7.6, and -9.4 h*L/min, P<.05). More subjects experienced severe nausea after morphine (n=7) than TRV130 1.5 or 3mg (n=0, 1), but not 4.5mg (n=9). TRV130 was generally well tolerated, and exposure was dose proportional. Thus, in this study, TRV130 produced greater analgesia than morphine at doses with less reduction in respiratory drive and less severe nausea. This demonstrates early clinical translation of ligand bias as an important new concept in receptor-targeted pharmacotherapy.

Citing Articles

Biased Opioid Receptor Agonists: Balancing Analgesic Efficacy and Side-Effect Profiles.

Ju J, Li Z, Liu J, Peng X, Gao F Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076488 PMC: 11899445. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26051862.


A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Oliceridine Research (2013-2024).

Song C, Huang X, Chen N, Song Q, Qiu Y Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025; 19:1305-1321.

PMID: 40026330 PMC: 11869766. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S497186.


Global Trends in Oliceridine (TRV130) Research from 2013 to 2024: A Bibliometrics and Knowledge Graph Analysis.

Wang C, Liu L, Bai X Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024; 18:4681-4692.

PMID: 39464167 PMC: 11505371. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S475205.


Opioid system and related ligands: from the past to future perspectives.

Rullo L, Morosini C, Lacorte A, Cristani M, Coluzzi F, Candeletti S J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024; 4(1):70.

PMID: 39390585 PMC: 11468104. DOI: 10.1186/s44158-024-00201-2.


Comparison of the reinforcing, antinociceptive, and respiratory depressant effects of prototypical and G-protein biased mu-opioid receptor agonists in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats.

Zamarripa C, Pareek T, Pham L, Blough B, Schrock H, Vallender E Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024; 241(12):2453-2469.

PMID: 39333403 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-024-06690-x.