» Articles » PMID: 24951027

Proposed New Clinicopathological Surrogate Definitions of Luminal A and Luminal B (HER2-negative) Intrinsic Breast Cancer Subtypes

Abstract

Introduction: The St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013 recognized substantial progress in the pathological characterization of breast cancer subtypes. A useful surrogate definition was developed to distinguish luminal A-like breast cancer from luminal B-like disease based on a combination of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR) and Ki-67 status, without a requirement for molecular diagnostics. Differences depend upon the choice of the threshold value for Ki-67 and the requirement for substantial PgR positivity. We aimed to verify the suitability of the new surrogate definitions of luminal subtypes in terms of distant disease control in a large series of patients.

Methods: We studied 9,415 women with a median follow-up of 8.1 years who (1) had ER-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer and (2) had undergone surgery at the European Institute of Oncology between 1994 and 2006. We evaluated distant disease-free survival of patients with "low" (<14%), "intermediate" (14% to 19%) or "high" (≥20%) Ki-67 positivity stratified by PgR expression (negative or low versus high). We calculated the cumulative incidence of distant events, considered competing events and performed multivariable analysis adjusted for pathologic tumor stage, pathologic node stage, tumor grade, peritumoral vascular invasion and menopausal status.

Results: Lack of substantial PgR positivity was associated with poorer outcomes only for patients with an intermediate Ki-67 level (P<0.001). The 4,890 patients (51.9%) with low Ki-67 level (any PgR expression level) or with intermediate Ki-67 level but substantial PgR positivity had comparably good outcomes and thus may represent a most advantageous grouping of those with luminal A-like disease.

Conclusions: The updated pathological definition of intrinsic molecular subtypes may maximize the number of patients classified as having the luminal A-like intrinsic subtype of breast cancer and for whom the use of cytotoxic drugs could mostly be avoided.

Citing Articles

Combining KPNA2 and FOXM1 Expression as Prognostic Markers and Therapeutic Targets in Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Yang T, Tsai C, Su Y, Chang Y, Lee F, Huang T Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40002266 PMC: 11853725. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040671.


High Ki67 expression, HER2 overexpression, and low progesterone receptor levels in high-grade DCIS: significant associations with clinical practice implications.

Schandiz H, Farkas L, Park D, Liu Y, Andersen S, Sauer T Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1467664.

PMID: 39959664 PMC: 11826238. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1467664.


Comparison of disease free survival in breast cancer molecular subtypes.

Esmati M, Monfaredi F, Vakili Sadeghi M, Ranaii M, Ghorbani H, Sedaghat S Caspian J Intern Med. 2024; 16(1):141-150.

PMID: 39619759 PMC: 11607120. DOI: 10.22088/cjim.16.1.141.


Targeting drug resistance in breast cancer: the potential of miRNA and nanotechnology-driven delivery systems.

Verma A, Patel K, Kumar A Nanoscale Adv. 2024; 6(24):6079-6095.

PMID: 39569336 PMC: 11575621. DOI: 10.1039/d4na00660g.


Taxane/anthracycline combinations reduced incidence of breast cancer recurrence in young women across molecular subtypes: a real-world evidence of Taiwan from 2011 to 2019.

Chien Y, Lin L, Lin Y, Hsieh Y, Tu S, Chiou H Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 209(3):647-658.

PMID: 39487912 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07527-z.


References
1.
Goldhirsch A, Winer E, Coates A, Gelber R, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thurlimann B . Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24(9):2206-23. PMC: 3755334. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt303. View

2.
Cheang M, Chia S, Voduc D, Gao D, Leung S, Snider J . Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101(10):736-50. PMC: 2684553. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp082. View

3.
Mengel M, von Wasielewski R, Wiese B, Rudiger T, Muller-Hermelink H, Kreipe H . Inter-laboratory and inter-observer reproducibility of immunohistochemical assessment of the Ki-67 labelling index in a large multi-centre trial. J Pathol. 2002; 198(3):292-9. DOI: 10.1002/path.1218. View

4.
Goldhirsch A, Wood W, Coates A, Gelber R, Thurlimann B, Senn H . Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol. 2011; 22(8):1736-47. PMC: 3144634. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr304. View

5.
Polley M, Leung S, McShane L, Gao D, Hugh J, Mastropasqua M . An international Ki67 reproducibility study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013; 105(24):1897-906. PMC: 3888090. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt306. View