» Articles » PMID: 24945016

Right Hemisphere Dysfunction is Better Predicted by Emotional Prosody Impairments As Compared to Neglect

Overview
Date 2014 Jun 20
PMID 24945016
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Neurologists generally consider hemispatial neglect to be the primary cognitive deficit following right hemisphere lesions. However, the right hemisphere has a critical role in many cognitive, communication and social functions; for example, in processing emotional prosody (tone of voice). We tested the hypothesis that impaired recognition of emotional prosody is a more accurate indicator of right hemisphere dysfunction than is neglect.

Methods: We tested 28 right hemisphere stroke (RHS) patients and 24 hospitalized age and education matched controls with MRI, prosody testing and a hemispatial neglect battery. Emotion categorization tasks assessed recognition of emotions from prosodic cues. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to compare tests in their ability to distinguish stroke patients from controls.

Results: ROC analyses revealed that the Prosody Score was more effective than the Neglect Battery Score in distinguishing stroke patients from controls, as measured by area under the curve (AUC); Prosody Score = 0.84; Neglect Battery Score =0. 57. The Prosody Score correctly classified 78.9%, while Neglect Score correctly classified 55.8% of participants as patients versus controls. The Prosody Score was similar to the total NIH Stroke Scale in identifying RHS patients (AUC=0.86, correctly classifying 80.1% of patients versus controls), but the tests only partially overlapped in the patients identified.

Conclusions: Severe prosody impairment may be a better indicator of right hemisphere dysfunction than neglect. Larger studies are needed to determine if including a bedside test of Prosody with the NIH Stroke Scale would most efficiently and reliably identify right hemisphere ischemia.

Citing Articles

A mHealth application to identify cognitive communication disorder after right hemisphere stroke: development and beta testing.

Love A, Cornwell P, Hewetson R, Binnewies S Mhealth. 2025; 11:2.

PMID: 39944859 PMC: 11811648. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-54.


Emotional processing in patients with single brain damage in the right hemisphere.

Alvarez-Fernandez S, Andrade-Gonzalez N, Simal P, Matias-Guiu J, Gomez-Escalonilla C, Rodriguez-Jimenez R BMC Psychol. 2023; 11(1):8.

PMID: 36635763 PMC: 9837967. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-022-01033-x.


The Company Prosodic Deficits Keep Following Right Hemisphere Stroke: A Systematic Review.

Sheppard S, Stockbridge M, Keator L, Murray L, Blake M J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2022; 28(10):1075-1090.

PMID: 34989666 PMC: 9256864. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617721001302.


Making Sense of Right Hemisphere Discourse Using RHDBank.

Minga J, Johnson M, Blake M, Fromm D, MacWhinney B Top Lang Disord. 2021; 41(1):99-122.

PMID: 34584326 PMC: 8475789. DOI: 10.1097/tld.0000000000000244.


Explicit Training to Improve Affective Prosody Recognition in Adults with Acute Right Hemisphere Stroke.

Durfee A, Sheppard S, Meier E, Bunker L, Cui E, Crainiceanu C Brain Sci. 2021; 11(5).

PMID: 34065453 PMC: 8161405. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11050667.


References
1.
Ross E, Thompson R, Yenkosky J . Lateralization of affective prosody in brain and the callosal integration of hemispheric language functions. Brain Lang. 1997; 56(1):27-54. DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1731. View

2.
Ley R, Bryden M . A dissociation of right and left hemispheric effects for recognizing emotional tone and verbal content. Brain Cogn. 1982; 1(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1016/0278-2626(82)90002-1. View

3.
Ross E, Monnot M . Neurology of affective prosody and its functional-anatomic organization in right hemisphere. Brain Lang. 2007; 104(1):51-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.04.007. View

4.
Pell M . Cerebral mechanisms for understanding emotional prosody in speech. Brain Lang. 2005; 96(2):221-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2005.04.007. View

5.
Blonder L, Bowers D, Heilman K . The role of the right hemisphere in emotional communication. Brain. 1991; 114 ( Pt 3):1115-27. DOI: 10.1093/brain/114.3.1115. View