Delayed Plastic Responses to Anodal TDCS in Older Adults

Overview

Journal Front Aging Neurosci

Specialty Geriatrics

Date 2014 Jun 18

PMID 24936185

Citations 41

Authors

Hakuei Fujiyama

Jane Hyde

Mark R Hinder

Seok-Jin Kim

Graeme H McCormack

James C Vickers

Jeffery J Summers

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Despite the abundance of research reporting the neurophysiological and behavioral effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in healthy young adults and clinical populations, the extent of potential neuroplastic changes induced by tDCS in healthy older adults is not well understood. The present study compared the extent and time course of anodal tDCS-induced plastic changes in primary motor cortex (M1) in young and older adults. Furthermore, as it has been suggested that neuroplasticity and associated learning depends on the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene polymorphisms, we also assessed the impact of BDNF polymorphism on these effects. Corticospinal excitability was examined using transcranial magnetic stimulation before and following (0, 10, 20, 30 min) anodal tDCS (30 min, 1 mA) or sham in young and older adults. While the overall extent of increases in corticospinal excitability induced by anodal tDCS did not vary reliably between young and older adults, older adults exhibited a delayed response; the largest increase in corticospinal excitability occurred 30 min following stimulation for older adults, but immediately post-stimulation for the young group. BDNF genotype did not result in significant differences in the observed excitability increases for either age group. The present study suggests that tDCS-induced plastic changes are delayed as a result of healthy aging, but that the overall efficacy of the plasticity mechanism remains unaffected.

Citing Articles

Barriers to Enrollment in a Post-Stroke Neuromodulation and Walking Study: Implications for Recruiting Women.

Mehta T, Cleland B, Madhavan S Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2024; 38(3):207-213.

PMID: 38314561 PMC: 10939762. DOI: 10.1177/15459683241230028.

Short-term effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in the nociceptive behavior of neuropathic pain rats in development.

Crespo P, Martins L, Martins O, Camacho Dos Reis C, Goulart R, de Souza A AIMS Neurosci. 2024; 10(4):433-446.

PMID: 38188001 PMC: 10767070. DOI: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023032.

Modulation of dorsal premotor cortex differentially influences I-wave excitability in primary motor cortex of young and older adults.

Liao W, Opie G, Ziemann U, Semmler J J Physiol. 2023; 601(14):2959-2974.

PMID: 37194369 PMC: 10952229. DOI: 10.1113/JP284204.

Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Loud Sounds Produces Plastic Changes in Motor Output.

Germann M, Maffitt N, Poll A, Raditya M, Ting J, Baker S J Neurosci. 2023; 43(14):2469-2481.

PMID: 36859307 PMC: 10082460. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0228-21.2022.

Anodal tDCS does not enhance the learning of the sequential finger-tapping task by motor imagery practice in healthy older adults.

Metais A, Muller C, Boublay N, Breuil C, Guillot A, Daligault S Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:1060791.

PMID: 36570544 PMC: 9780548. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.1060791.

References

Todd G, Kimber T, Ridding M, Semmler J . Reduced motor cortex plasticity following inhibitory rTMS in older adults. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010; 121(3):441-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.089. View

Kleim J, Chan S, Pringle E, Schallert K, Procaccio V, Jimenez R . BDNF val66met polymorphism is associated with modified experience-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2006; 9(6):735-7. DOI: 10.1038/nn1699. View

Ruohonen J, Karhu J . tDCS possibly stimulates glial cells. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012; 123(10):2006-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.02.082. View

Kim S, Linden D . Ubiquitous plasticity and memory storage. Neuron. 2007; 56(4):582-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.030. View

Huang Y, Edwards M, Rounis E, Bhatia K, Rothwell J . Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005; 45(2):201-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033. View

Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, Schambra H, Ji Y, Cohen L . Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron. 2010; 66(2):198-204. PMC: 2864780. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.035. View

Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, Floel A, Wu W, Gerloff C . Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain. 2005; 128(Pt 3):490-9. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh369. View

Nitsche M, Schauenburg A, Lang N, Liebetanz D, Exner C, Paulus W . Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. J Cogn Neurosci. 2003; 15(4):619-26. DOI: 10.1162/089892903321662994. View

Hamada M, Murase N, Hasan A, Balaratnam M, Rothwell J . The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cereb Cortex. 2012; 23(7):1593-605. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs147. View

10.

Carroll T, Lee M, Hsu M, Sayde J . Unilateral practice of a ballistic movement causes bilateral increases in performance and corticospinal excitability. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008; 104(6):1656-64. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01351.2007. View

11.

Lindenberg R, Nachtigall L, Meinzer M, Sieg M, Floel A . Differential effects of dual and unihemispheric motor cortex stimulation in older adults. J Neurosci. 2013; 33(21):9176-83. PMC: 6705011. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0055-13.2013. View

12.

Carson R, Nelson B, Buick A, Carroll T, Kennedy N, Mac Cann R . Characterizing changes in the excitability of corticospinal projections to proximal muscles of the upper limb. Brain Stimul. 2013; 6(5):760-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.016. View

13.

Monte-Silva K, Kuo M, Hessenthaler S, Fresnoza S, Liebetanz D, Paulus W . Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2012; 6(3):424-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.011. View

14.

Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen L, Benecke R, Classen J . Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain. 2000; 123 Pt 3:572-84. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.3.572. View

15.

Ziemann U, Siebner H . Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity. Brain Stimul. 2010; 1(1):60-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2007.08.003. View

16.

Pearce A, Clark R, Kidgell D . A comparison of two methods in acquiring stimulus-response curves with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2012; 6(3):306-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.05.010. View

17.

Liebetanz D, Nitsche M, Tergau F, Paulus W . Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 10):2238-47. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf238. View

18.

Pascual-Leone A, Freitas C, Oberman L, Horvath J, Halko M, Eldaief M . Characterizing brain cortical plasticity and network dynamics across the age-span in health and disease with TMS-EEG and TMS-fMRI. Brain Topogr. 2011; 24(3-4):302-15. PMC: 3374641. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-011-0196-8. View

19.

Vines B, Nair D, Schlaug G . Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport. 2006; 17(6):671-4. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200604240-00023. View

20.

Coombes S, Tandonnet C, Fujiyama H, Janelle C, Cauraugh J, Summers J . Emotion and motor preparation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of corticospinal motor tract excitability. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009; 9(4):380-8. DOI: 10.3758/CABN.9.4.380. View