» Articles » PMID: 24936126

Is Increasing the Dose of Entecavir Effective in Partial Virological Responders?

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2014 Jun 18
PMID 24936126
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To analyze the effect of increasing Entecavir (ETV) dosage in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who partially responded to ETV after 1 year.

Methods: Twenty-three hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 36 HBeAg-negative patients with CHB were treated with ETV 0.5 mg daily. After 1 year of the treatment, those with detectable hepatitis B virus (HBV-DNA) were randomized to either ETV 0.5 mg or 1 mg daily. The resistance to ETV was excluded. Both groups received ETV for 3 years. The groups were compared in aspects of undetectable DNA.

Results: Group 1 was given 0.5 mg ETV and included 32 patients (20 HBeAg-negative and 12 HBeAg-positive). Group 2 was given 1 mg ETV and consisted of 27 patients (16 HBeAg-negative and eleven HBeAg-positive). Group 2 had more effective suppression of HBV-DNA while both groups had comparable rates of HBeAg loss (58% and 63% for group 1 and group 2, respectively) and alanine transaminase (ALT) normalization at the end of 4 years.

Conclusion: Increasing ETV dose from 0.5 mg to 1 mg after 1 year of ETV treatment may provide an effective suppression of viral replication.

Citing Articles

Severe de novo Hepatitis B Recovered from Late-Onset Liver Insufficiency with Prolonged Ascites and Hypoalbuminemia due to Hepatitis B Virus Genotype Bj with Precore Mutation.

Sato A, Ishii T, Sano F, Yamada T, Takahashi H, Matsumoto N Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2016; 10(3):553-559.

PMID: 27920641 PMC: 5121562. DOI: 10.1159/000450543.

References
1.
Zoutendijk R, Reijnders J, Brown A, Zoulim F, Mutimer D, Deterding K . Entecavir treatment for chronic hepatitis B: adaptation is not needed for the majority of naïve patients with a partial virological response. Hepatology. 2011; 54(2):443-51. DOI: 10.1002/hep.24406. View

2.
Yuen M, Lai C . Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: Evolution over two decades. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 26 Suppl 1:138-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06545.x. View

3.
Ha N, Ha N, Chaung K, Trinh H, Nguyen H, Nguyen K . Similar response to entecavir 0.5 and 1.0 mg in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients: a case-control study. Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 59(1):168-73. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2940-2. View

4.
Marcellin P, Heathcote E, Buti M, Gane E, de Man R, Krastev Z . Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(23):2442-55. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802878. View

5.
Keating G . Entecavir: a review of its use in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in patients with decompensated liver disease. Drugs. 2011; 71(18):2511-29. DOI: 10.2165/11208510-000000000-00000. View