» Articles » PMID: 24932319

Influence of Structural Heterogeneity on Diffusion of CH and CO in Silicon Carbide-Derived Nanoporous Carbon

Overview
Date 2014 Jun 17
PMID 24932319
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigate the influence of structural heterogeneity on the transport properties of simple gases in a Hybrid Reverse Monte Carlo (HRMC) constructed model of silicon carbide-derived carbon (SiC-DC). The energy landscape of the system is determined based on free energy analysis of the atomistic model. The overall energy barriers of the system for different gases are computed along with important properties, such as Henry constant and differential enthalpy of adsorption at infinite dilution, and indicate hydrophobicity of the SiC-DC structure and its affinity for CO and CH adsorption. We also study the effect of molecular geometry, pore structure and energy heterogeneity considering different hopping scenarios for diffusion of CO and CH through ultramicropores using the Nudged Elastic Band (NEB) method. It is shown that the energy barrier of a hopping molecule is very sensitive to the shape of the pore entry. We provide evidence for the influence of structural heterogeneity on self-diffusivity of methane and carbon dioxide using molecular dynamics simulation, based on a maximum in the variation of self-diffusivity with loading. A comparison of the MD simulation results with self-diffusivities from quasi-elastic neutron scattering (QENS) measurements and, with macroscopic uptake-based low-density transport coefficients, reveals the existence of internal barriers not captured in MD simulation and QENS experiments. Nevertheless, the simulation and macroscopic uptake-based diffusion coefficients agree within a factor of 2-3, indicating that our HRMC model structure captures most of the important energy barriers affecting the transport of CH in the nanostructure of SiC-DC.

Citing Articles

Structures, Electronic Properties, and Gas Permeability of 3D Pillared Silicon Carbide Nanostructures.

Arayawut O, Kerdcharoen T, Wongchoosuk C Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 35683725 PMC: 9182379. DOI: 10.3390/nano12111869.


Performance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture.

Farmahini A, Krishnamurthy S, Friedrich D, Brandani S, Sarkisov L Chem Rev. 2021; 121(17):10666-10741.

PMID: 34374527 PMC: 8431366. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266.

References
1.
Jakobtorweihen S, Lowe C, Keil F, Smit B . Diffusion of chain molecules and mixtures in carbon nanotubes: the effect of host lattice flexibility and theory of diffusion in the Knudsen regime. J Chem Phys. 2007; 127(2):024904. DOI: 10.1063/1.2753477. View

2.
Furukawa H, Ko N, Go Y, Aratani N, Choi S, Choi E . Ultrahigh porosity in metal-organic frameworks. Science. 2010; 329(5990):424-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1192160. View

3.
Hoover . Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys Rev A Gen Phys. 1985; 31(3):1695-1697. DOI: 10.1103/physreva.31.1695. View

4.
Bitzek E, Koskinen P, Gahler F, Moseler M, Gumbsch P . Structural relaxation made simple. Phys Rev Lett. 2006; 97(17):170201. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.170201. View

5.
Haldoupis E, Nair S, Sholl D . Pore size analysis of >250,000 hypothetical zeolites. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011; 13(11):5053-60. DOI: 10.1039/c0cp02766a. View