6.
Mee J
. Reproductive issues arising from different management systems in the dairy industry. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012; 47 Suppl 5:42-50.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02107.x.
View
7.
Souza M, Detmann E, Paulino M, Sampaio C, Lazzarini I, Valadares Filho S
. Intake, digestibility and rumen dynamics of neutral detergent fibre in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogen and/or starch. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010; 42(6):1299-310.
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-010-9566-6.
View
8.
Ranasinghe R, Nakao T, Yamada K, Koike K, Hayashi A, Dematawewa C
. Characteristics of prolonged luteal phase identified by milk progesterone concentrations and its effects on reproductive performance in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 2010; 94(1):116-27.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3213.
View
9.
Royal M, Flint A, Woolliams J
. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among endocrine and traditional fertility traits and production traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2002; 85(4):958-67.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74155-6.
View
10.
McDougall S, Hussein H, Aberdein D, Buckle K, Roche J, Burke C
. Relationships between cytology, bacteriology and vaginal discharge scores and reproductive performance in dairy cattle. Theriogenology. 2011; 76(2):229-40.
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.12.024.
View
11.
Lane E, Crowe M, Beltman M, More S
. The influence of cow and management factors on reproductive performance of Irish seasonal calving dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci. 2013; 141(1-2):34-41.
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.06.019.
View
12.
Petersson K, Berglund B, Strandberg E, Gustafsson H, Flint A, Woolliams J
. Genetic analysis of postpartum measures of luteal activity in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2006; 90(1):427-34.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)72644-9.
View
13.
Opsomer G, Grohn Y, Hertl J, Coryn M, Deluyker H, De Kruif A
. Risk factors for post partum ovarian dysfunction in high producing dairy cows in Belgium: a field study. Theriogenology. 2000; 53(4):841-57.
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00234-X.
View
14.
Kaneko K, Kawakami S, Miyoshi M, Abukawa T, Yamanaka S, Mochizuki M
. Effect of retained placenta on subsequent bacteriological and cytological intrauterine environment and reproduction in Holstein dairy cows. Theriogenology. 2006; 48(4):617-24.
DOI: 10.1016/s0093-691x(97)00278-1.
View
15.
Pollott G, Coffey M
. The effect of genetic merit and production system on dairy cow fertility, measured using progesterone profiles and on-farm recording. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91(9):3649-60.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0913.
View
16.
Ndambi O, Garcia O, Balikowa D, Kiconco D, Hemme T, Latacz-Lohmann U
. Milk production systems in Central Uganda: a farm economic analysis. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2008; 40(4):269-79.
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-007-9091-4.
View
17.
Sampaio C, Detmann E, Paulino M, Valadares Filho S, de Souza M, Lazzarini I
. Intake and digestibility in cattle fed low-quality tropical forage and supplemented with nitrogenous compounds. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010; 42(7):1471-9.
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-010-9581-7.
View
18.
Hudson C, Bradley A, Breen J, Green M
. Associations between udder health and reproductive performance in United Kingdom dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2012; 95(7):3683-97.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4629.
View
19.
Halpern N, Erb H, Smith R
. Duration of retained fetal membranes and subsequent fertility in dairy cows. Theriogenology. 1985; 23(5):807-13.
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(85)90156-6.
View
20.
Lucy M
. Reproductive loss in high-producing dairy cattle: where will it end?. J Dairy Sci. 2001; 84(6):1277-93.
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70158-0.
View