» Articles » PMID: 24925773

Impaired Facilitatory Mechanisms of Auditory Attention After Damage of the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex

Overview
Journal Cereb Cortex
Specialty Neurology
Date 2014 Jun 14
PMID 24925773
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is growing evidence that auditory selective attention operates via distinct facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms enabling selective enhancement and suppression of sound processing, respectively. The lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) plays a crucial role in the top-down control of selective attention. However, whether the LPFC controls facilitatory, inhibitory, or both attentional mechanisms is unclear. Facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms were assessed, in patients with LPFC damage, by comparing event-related potentials (ERPs) to attended and ignored sounds with ERPs to these same sounds when attention was equally distributed to all sounds. In control subjects, we observed 2 late frontally distributed ERP components: a transient facilitatory component occurring from 150 to 250 ms after sound onset; and an inhibitory component onsetting at 250 ms. Only the facilitatory component was affected in patients with LPFC damage: this component was absent when attending to sounds delivered in the ear contralateral to the lesion, with the most prominent decreases observed over the damaged brain regions. These findings have 2 important implications: (i) they provide evidence for functionally distinct facilitatory and inhibitory mechanisms supporting late auditory selective attention; (ii) they show that the LPFC is involved in the control of the facilitatory mechanisms of auditory attention.

Citing Articles

Explainable fNIRS-based pain decoding under pharmacological conditions via deep transfer learning approach.

Eken A, Yuce M, Yukselen G, Erdogan S Neurophotonics. 2024; 11(4):045015.

PMID: 39691581 PMC: 11651663. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.11.4.045015.


A Review of Auditory Attention: Neural Mechanisms, Theories, and Affective Disorders.

Razzaghipour A, Ashrafi M, Mohammadzadeh A Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(3):2250-2256.

PMID: 38883545 PMC: 11169100. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-023-04373-1.


Individualized Closed-Loop Acoustic Stimulation Suggests an Alpha Phase Dependence of Sound Evoked and Induced Brain Activity Measured with EEG Recordings.

Harlow T, Marquez S, Bressler S, Read H eNeuro. 2024; 11(6).

PMID: 38834300 PMC: 11181104. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0511-23.2024.


Comparison of different rhythmic auditory stimuli on prefrontal cortex cortical activation during upper limb movement in patients with Parkinson's disease: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Wang J, Li Y, Wang Y, Wang C, Qie S, Jin Z Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1336268.

PMID: 38476192 PMC: 10927970. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1336268.


Pathological claustrum activity drives aberrant cognitive network processing in human chronic pain.

Stewart B, Keaser M, Lee H, Margerison S, Cormie M, Moayedi M bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37961503 PMC: 10635040. DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.01.564054.


References
1.
Muller-Preuss P, PLOOG D . Inhibition of auditory cortical neurons during phonation. Brain Res. 1981; 215(1-2):61-76. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90491-1. View

2.
Anderson M, Ochsner K, Kuhl B, Cooper J, Robertson E, Gabrieli S . Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories. Science. 2004; 303(5655):232-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1089504. View

3.
Zanto T, Rubens M, Thangavel A, Gazzaley A . Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 14(5):656-61. PMC: 3083493. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2773. View

4.
Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier J . Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989; 72(2):184-7. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6. View

5.
Chao L, Knight R . Human prefrontal lesions increase distractibility to irrelevant sensory inputs. Neuroreport. 1995; 6(12):1605-10. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199508000-00005. View