A Novel Solution for the High Defibrillation Threshold in Patients with a DF-4 Lead: Adding a High Voltage Adaptor/Splitter
Overview
Overview
Authors
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract
A high defibrillation threshold occurs in approximately 6% of implants. The defibrillation threshold can be improved by addition of a defibrillation lead. However, the DF-4 high energy ICD header precludes the addition of a defibrillation lead. Here we report on use of a new high voltage adaptor/splitter that enables the addition of an extra defibrillation lead.
Citing Articles
DF-4 Lead Connector: Innovative Technology, Unexpected Problems and Novel Solutions.
Bhargava K Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2014; 14(3):108-11.
PMID: 24920868 PMC: 4032777. DOI: 10.1016/s0972-6292(16)30751-3.
References
1.
Russo A, Sauer W, Gerstenfeld E, Hsia H, Lin D, Cooper J
. Defibrillation threshold testing: is it really necessary at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion?. Heart Rhythm. 2005; 2(5):456-61.
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.01.015.
View
2.
Sticherling C, Burri H
. Introduction of new industry standards for cardiac implantable electronic devices: balancing benefits and unexpected risks. Europace. 2012; 14(8):1081-6.
PMC: 3404557.
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eus034.
View
3.
Cantillon D, Ha K, Styperek R, Jumrussirikul P, Mirro M, Wong W
. Clinical experience and procedural outcomes associated with the DF4 implantable cardioverter defibrillator system: the SJ4 postapproval study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013; 36(7):855-62.
DOI: 10.1111/pace.12130.
View
4.
Kashani A, Barold S
. Significance of QRS complex duration in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46(12):2183-92.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.071.
View
5.
Cogert G, Cameron C, Sandler D
. Limitations of the DF-4 defibrillator connector necessitating device removal. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010; 35(1):e24-6.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02873.x.
View