» Articles » PMID: 24920170

Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses of the Thermophilic, Aceticlastic Methanogen Methanosaeta Thermophila Responding to Ammonia Stress

Overview
Date 2014 Jun 13
PMID 24920170
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The inhibitory effects of ammonia on two different degradation pathways of methanogenic acetate were evaluated using a pure culture (Methanosaeta thermophila strain PT) and defined co-culture (Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus strain TM and Thermacetogenium phaeum strain PB), which represented aceticlastic and syntrophic methanogenesis, respectively. Growth experiments with high concentrations of ammonia clearly demonstrated that sensitivity to ammonia stress was markedly higher in M. thermophila PT than in the syntrophic co-culture. M. thermophila PT also exhibited higher sensitivity to high pH stress, which indicated that an inability to maintain pH homeostasis is an underlying cause of ammonia inhibition. Methanogenesis was inhibited in the resting cells of M. thermophila PT with moderate concentrations of ammonia, suggesting that the inhibition of enzymes involved in methanogenesis may be one of the major factors responsible for ammonia toxicity. Transcriptomic analysis revealed a broad range of disturbances in M. thermophila PT cells under ammonia stress conditions, including protein denaturation, oxidative stress, and intracellular cation imbalances. The results of the present study clearly demonstrated that syntrophic acetate degradation dominated over aceticlastic methanogenesis under ammonia stress conditions, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies on complex microbial community systems. Our results also imply that the co-existence of multiple metabolic pathways and their different sensitivities to stress factors confer resiliency on methanogenic processes.

Citing Articles

Methanol transfer supports metabolic syntrophy between bacteria and archaea.

Huang Y, Igarashi K, Liu L, Mayumi D, Ujiie T, Fu L Nature. 2025; 639(8053):190-195.

PMID: 39880954 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08491-w.


Transcriptional Regulation of Methanol Dehydrogenases in the Methanotrophic Bacterium Methylococcus capsulatus Bath by Soluble and Insoluble Lanthanides.

Xie R, Takashino M, Igarashi K, Kitagawa W, Kato S Microbes Environ. 2023; 38(4).

PMID: 38092408 PMC: 10728633. DOI: 10.1264/jsme2.ME23065.


and became dominant acetate utilizers in a methanogenic reactor operated under strong ammonia stress.

Feng G, Zeng Y, Wang H, Chen Y, Tang Y Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:1098814.

PMID: 36687577 PMC: 9853277. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1098814.


L. leaf powder promotes initiation of indigo reduction by inducing of rapid transition of the microbial community.

Lopes H, Tu Z, Sumi H, Yumoto I Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:957809.

PMID: 36016790 PMC: 9395713. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.957809.


An iron corrosion-assisted H-supplying system: a culture method for methanogens and acetogens under low H pressures.

Kato S, Takashino M, Igarashi K, Mochimaru H, Mayumi D, Tamaki H Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):19124.

PMID: 33154519 PMC: 7645788. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76267-z.


References
1.
Liu T, Sung S . Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic aceticlastic methanogens. Water Sci Technol. 2002; 45(10):113-20. View

2.
Sprott G, Shaw K, Jarrell K . Ammonia/potassium exchange in methanogenic bacteria. J Biol Chem. 1984; 259(20):12602-8. View

3.
Sasaki K, Morita M, Hirano S, Ohmura N, Igarashi Y . Decreasing ammonia inhibition in thermophilic methanogenic bioreactors using carbon fiber textiles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 90(4):1555-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3215-5. View

4.
Wittmann C, Zeng A, Deckwer W . Growth inhibition by ammonia and use of a pH-controlled feeding strategy for the effective cultivation of Mycobacterium chlorophenolicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1995; 44(3-4):519-25. DOI: 10.1007/BF00169954. View

5.
Abouelenien F, Fujiwara W, Namba Y, Kosseva M, Nishio N, Nakashimada Y . Improved methane fermentation of chicken manure via ammonia removal by biogas recycle. Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101(16):6368-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.071. View