» Articles » PMID: 24920156

Evaluation of Hospital Readmissions in Surgical Patients: Do Administrative Data Tell the Real Story?

Abstract

Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has developed an all-cause readmission measure that uses administrative data to measure readmission rates and financially penalize hospitals with higher-than-expected readmission rates.

Objectives: To examine the accuracy of administrative codes in determining the cause of readmission as determined by medical record review, to evaluate the readmission measure's ability to accurately identify a readmission as planned, and to document the frequency of readmissions for reasons clinically unrelated to the original hospital stay.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients discharged from general surgery services at a tertiary care, university-affiliated teaching hospital during 8 consecutive quarters (quarter 4 [October through December] of 2009 through quarter 3 [July through September] of 2011). Clinical readmission diagnosis determined from direct medical record review was compared with the administrative diagnosis recorded in a claims database. The number of planned hospital readmissions defined by the readmission measure was compared with the number identified using clinical data. Readmissions unrelated to the original hospital stay were identified using clinical data.

Main Outcomes And Measures: Discordance rate between administrative and clinical diagnoses for all hospital readmissions, discrepancy between planned readmissions defined by the readmission measure and identified by clinical medical record review, and fraction of hospital readmissions unrelated to the original hospital stay.

Results: Of the 315 hospital readmissions, the readmission diagnosis listed in the administrative claims data differed from the clinical diagnosis in 97 readmissions (30.8%). The readmission measure identified 15 readmissions (4.8%) as planned, whereas clinical data identified 43 readmissions (13.7%) as planned. Unrelated readmissions comprised 70 of the 258 unplanned readmissions (27.1%).

Conclusions And Relevance: Administrative billing data, as used by the readmission measure, do not reliably describe the reason for readmission. The readmission measure accounts for less than half of the planned readmissions and does not account for the nearly one-third of readmissions unrelated to the original hospital stay. Implementation of this readmission measure may result in unwarranted financial penalties for hospitals.

Citing Articles

National Estimates of Short- and Longer-Term Hospital Readmissions After Major Surgery Among Community-Living Older Adults.

Wang Y, Leo-Summers L, Vander Wyk B, Davis-Plourde K, Gill T, Becher R JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(2):e240028.

PMID: 38416499 PMC: 10902728. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0028.


Comparison of cost and complication rates for profiling hospital performance in lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.

Greenberg J, Olsen M, Dibble C, Zhang J, Pennicooke B, Yamaguchi K Spine J. 2021; 21(12):2026-2034.

PMID: 34161844 PMC: 8720504. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.014.


Administrative Data Are Unreliable for Ranking Hospital Performance Based on Serious Complications After Spine Fusion.

Greenberg J, Olsen M, Poe J, Dibble C, Yamaguchi K, Kelly M Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021; 46(17):1181-1190.

PMID: 33826589 PMC: 8363514. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004017.


Readmissions after nonoperative trauma: Increased mortality and costs with delayed intervention.

McCrum M, Zhang C, Presson A, Nirula R J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019; 88(2):219-229.

PMID: 31804415 PMC: 7441581. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002560.


30-day unplanned readmission rate in otolaryngology patients: A population-based study in Thuringia, Germany.

Rippe W, Dittberner A, Boeger D, Buentzel J, Hoffmann K, Kaftan H PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0224146.

PMID: 31622434 PMC: 6797198. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224146.