» Articles » PMID: 24917185

Effect of Automated Drug Distribution Systems on Medication Error Rates in a Short-stay Geriatric Unit

Overview
Date 2014 Jun 12
PMID 24917185
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rationale, Aims And Objectives: To assess the impact of an automated drug distribution system on medication errors (MEs).

Methods: Before-after observational study in a 40-bed short stay geriatric unit within a 1800 bed general hospital in Valenciennes, France. Researchers attended nurse medication administration rounds and compared administered to prescribed drugs, before and after the drug distribution system changed from a ward stock system (WSS) to a unit dose dispensing system (UDDS), integrating a unit dose dispensing robot and automated medication dispensing cabinet (AMDC).

Results: A total of 615 opportunities of errors (OEs) were observed among 148 patients treated during the WSS period, and 783 OEs were observed among 166 patients treated during the UDDS period. ME [medication administration error (MAE)] rates were calculated and compared between the two periods. Secondary measures included type of errors, seriousness of errors and risk reduction for the patients. The implementation of an automated drug dispensing system resulted in a 53% reduction in MAEs. All error types were reduced in the UDDS period compared with the WSS period (P<0.001). Wrong dose and wrong drug errors were reduced by 79.1% (2.4% versus 0.5%, P=0.005) and 93.7% (1.9% versus 0.01%, P=0.009), respectively.

Conclusion: An automated UDDS combining a unit dose dispensing robot and AMDCs could reduce discrepancies between ordered and administered drugs, thus improving medication safety among the elderly.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Automation Models in Hospital Pharmacy: Systematic Review of Technologies, Practices, and Clinical Impacts.

Meknassi Salime G, Bhirich N, Cherif Chefchaouni A, El Hamdaoui O, El Baraka S, Elalaoui Y Hosp Pharm. 2025; :00185787251315622.

PMID: 40026489 PMC: 11869230. DOI: 10.1177/00185787251315622.


'Technology in end-of-life care is very important': the view of nurses regarding technology and end-of-life care.

Vandersman P, Tieman J BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):809.

PMID: 39506712 PMC: 11542272. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02475-x.


Automated Drugs Dispensing Systems in Hospitals: a Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Study Across Six European Countries.

Foglia E, Asperti F, Antonacci G, Jani Y, Garagiola E, Bellavia D Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024; 16:679-696.

PMID: 39319287 PMC: 11421443. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S468417.


Improving Inpatient Medication Dispensing with an Automated System.

Almalki A, Jambi A, Elbehiry B, AlButi H Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2024; 6(4):117-125.

PMID: 38404460 PMC: 10887473. DOI: 10.36401/JQSH-23-15.


Regular Medications in the Emergency Department Short Stay Unit (ReMedIES): Can Prescribing be Improved Without Increasing Resources?.

Jackson A, Lewis M, Meek R, Kim-Blackmore J, Khan I, Deng Y Hosp Pharm. 2024; 59(1):110-117.

PMID: 38223859 PMC: 10786055. DOI: 10.1177/00185787231194999.


References
1.
Leonard M, Cimino M, Shaha S, McDougal S, Pilliod J, Brodsky L . Risk reduction for adverse drug events through sequential implementation of patient safety initiatives in a children's hospital. Pediatrics. 2006; 118(4):e1124-9. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2005-3183. View

2.
Taxis K, Dean B, Barber N . Hospital drug distribution systems in the UK and Germany--a study of medication errors. Pharm World Sci. 1999; 21(1):25-31. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008616622472. View

3.
Landrigan C, Parry G, Bones C, Hackbarth A, Goldmann D, Sharek P . Temporal trends in rates of patient harm resulting from medical care. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363(22):2124-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1004404. View

4.
Allan E, BARKER K . Fundamentals of medication error research. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990; 47(3):555-71. View

5.
Fontan J, Maneglier V, Nguyen V, Loirat C, Brion F . Medication errors in hospitals: computerized unit dose drug dispensing system versus ward stock distribution system. Pharm World Sci. 2003; 25(3):112-7. DOI: 10.1023/a:1024053514359. View