Molecular Insight of Isotypes Specific β-tubulin Interaction of Tubulin Heterodimer with Noscapinoids
Overview
Molecular Biology
Authors
Affiliations
Noscapine and its derivatives bind stoichiometrically to tubulin, alter its dynamic instability and thus effectively inhibit the cellular proliferation of a wide variety of cancer cells including many drug-resistant variants. The tubulin molecule is composed of α- and β-tubulin, which exist as various isotypes whose distribution and drug-binding properties are significantly different. Although the noscapinoids bind to a site overlapping with colchicine, their interaction is more biased towards β-tubulin. In fact, their precise interaction and binding affinity with specific isotypes of β-tubulin in the αβ-heterodimer has never been addressed. In this study, the binding affinity of a panel of noscapinoids with each type of tubulin was investigated computationally. We found that the binding score of a specific noscapinoid with each type of tubulin isotype is different. Specifically, amino-noscapine has the highest binding score of -6.4, -7.2, -7.4 and -7.3 kcal/mol with αβI, αβII, αβIII and αβIV isotypes, respectively. Similarly 10 showed higher binding affinity of -6.8 kcal/mol with αβV, whereas 8 had the highest binding affinity of -7.2, -7.1 and -7.2 kcal/mol, respectively with αβVI, αβVII and αβVIII isotypes. More importantly, both amino-noscapine and its clinical derivative, bromo-noscapine have the highest binding affinity of -46.2 and -38.1 kcal/mol against αβIII (overexpression of αβIII has been associated with resistance to a wide range of chemotherapeutic drugs for several human malignancies) as measured using MM-PBSA. Knowledge of the isotype specificity of the noscapinoids may allow for development of novel therapeutic agents based on this class of drugs.
Xu Z, Xia L, Sun M, Huang P, Zeng J World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022; 38(5):77.
PMID: 35316417 DOI: 10.1007/s11274-022-03265-w.
Pallante L, Rocca A, Klejborowska G, Huczynski A, Grasso G, Tuszynski J Front Chem. 2020; 8:108.
PMID: 32154219 PMC: 7047339. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00108.
Cury N, Muhlethaler T, Laranjeira A, Canevarolo R, Zenatti P, Lucena-Agell D iScience. 2019; 21:95-109.
PMID: 31655259 PMC: 6820235. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.10.003.
Recent Developments and Applications of the MMPBSA Method.
Wang C, Greene D, Xiao L, Qi R, Luo R Front Mol Biosci. 2018; 4:87.
PMID: 29367919 PMC: 5768160. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00087.
Kumbhar B, Borogaon A, Panda D, Kunwar A PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0156048.
PMID: 27227832 PMC: 4882049. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156048.