» Articles » PMID: 24914013

How is the Electronic Health Record Being Used? Use of EHR Data to Assess Physician-level Variability in Technology Use

Overview
Date 2014 Jun 11
PMID 24914013
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Studies of the effects of electronic health records (EHRs) have had mixed findings, which may be attributable to unmeasured confounders such as individual variability in use of EHR features.

Objective: To capture physician-level variations in use of EHR features, associations with other predictors, and usage intensity over time.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of primary care providers eligible for meaningful use at a network of federally qualified health centers, using commercial EHR data from January 2010 through June 2013, a period during which the organization was preparing for and in the early stages of meaningful use.

Results: Data were analyzed for 112 physicians and nurse practitioners, consisting of 430,803 encounters with 99,649 patients. EHR usage metrics were developed to capture how providers accessed and added to patient data (eg, problem list updates), used clinical decision support (eg, responses to alerts), communicated (eg, printing after-visit summaries), and used panel management options (eg, viewed panel reports). Provider-level variability was high: for example, the annual average proportion of encounters with problem lists updated ranged from 5% to 60% per provider. Some metrics were associated with provider, patient, or encounter characteristics. For example, problem list updates were more likely for new patients than established ones, and alert acceptance was negatively correlated with alert frequency.

Conclusions: Providers using the same EHR developed personalized patterns of use of EHR features. We conclude that physician-level usage of EHR features may be a valuable additional predictor in research on the effects of EHRs on healthcare quality and costs.

Citing Articles

Relationships Among Physician Vendor-Derived Proficiency Score, Gender, and Time in the Electronic Health Record.

Liang K, Gelles E, Tarabichi Y Fam Med. 2025; 57(1):28-34.

PMID: 39777653 PMC: 11745515. DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.678473.


Unified Clinical Vocabulary Embeddings for Advancing Precision Medicine.

Johnson R, Gottlieb U, Shaham G, Eisen L, Waxman J, Devons-Sberro S medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39677476 PMC: 11643188. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.03.24318322.


Clinical encounter heterogeneity and methods for resolving in networked EHR data: a study from N3C and RECOVER programs.

Leese P, Anand A, Girvin A, Manna A, Patel S, Yoo Y J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 30(6):1125-1136.

PMID: 37087110 PMC: 10198518. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad057.


Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.

Meunier P, Raynaud C, Guimaraes E, Gueyffier F, Letrilliart L Ann Fam Med. 2023; 21(1):57-69.

PMID: 36690490 PMC: 9870646. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2908.


Distinct components of alert fatigue in physicians' responses to a noninterruptive clinical decision support alert.

Murad D, Tsugawa Y, Elashoff D, Baldwin K, Bell D J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022; 30(1):64-72.

PMID: 36264258 PMC: 9748542. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac191.


References
1.
Lanham H, Sittig D, Leykum L, Parchman M, Pugh J, McDaniel R . Understanding differences in electronic health record (EHR) use: linking individual physicians' perceptions of uncertainty and EHR use patterns in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 21(1):73-81. PMC: 3912724. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001377. View

2.
Ash J, Sittig D, Campbell E, Guappone K, Dykstra R . Some unintended consequences of clinical decision support systems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008; :26-30. PMC: 2813668. View

3.
Tamblyn R, Reidel K, Patel V . Physicians' response to computerised alerts for psychotropic drugs in older persons: a multilevel analysis of the associated alert, patient and physician characteristics. BMJ Open. 2012; 2(5). PMC: 3488704. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001384. View

4.
Wright A, Pang J, Feblowitz J, Maloney F, Wilcox A, McLoughlin K . Improving completeness of electronic problem lists through clinical decision support: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012; 19(4):555-61. PMC: 3384110. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000521. View

5.
Ancker J, Kern L, Abramson E, Kaushal R . The Triangle Model for evaluating the effect of health information technology on healthcare quality and safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 19(1):61-5. PMC: 3240765. DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000385. View