» Articles » PMID: 24909431

Multifidus Muscle Size and Percentage Thickness Changes Among Patients with Unilateral Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and Healthy Controls in Prone and Standing

Overview
Journal Man Ther
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2014 Jun 10
PMID 24909431
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if differences exist in lumbar multifidus (LM) thickness at rest and during activation, between individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and controls. Lumbar multifidus thickness was assessed via rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI), and was performed in prone and standing both at rest and during muscle activation i.e. with a contralateral arm lift (CAL). Twenty participants were assessed; ten CLBP participants and ten controls. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging was used to measure LM thickness and percentage thickness change at L4/L5 and L5/S1 in four positions; prone at rest, prone during activation with a CAL, standing at rest, and standing during activation with a CAL. Independent and paired t-tests were used to calculate differences in LM thickness and percentage thickness change between groups, and also between sides in the CLBP group. There was a significant difference in LM percentage thickness change in standing during activation with a CAL; the CLBP demonstrated a greater percentage thickness increase at L5/S1 compared to the controls, (p = 0.05). There were no differences between groups at the L4/L5 level for this position. There were no differences between the groups for LM thickness or percentage thickness change in prone or standing at rest, or during activation with a CAL in prone. Within the CLBP group, no significant between side differences were found. These results give preliminary insight into possible differences in LM contractile behaviour during functional movements in CLBP, however, larger scale research is warranted.

Citing Articles

Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the lumbar multifidi muscles: Comparison of the magnetic resonance imaging and musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Gofeld M, Bharatha A Interv Pain Med. 2025; 4(1):100547.

PMID: 40027986 PMC: 11870187. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100547.


Evaluation of Abdominal Muscle Thickness Changes During Abdominal Hollowing Maneuver in Different Positions Using a Sphygmomanometer for People With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Delkhoush C, Bagheri R, Ramezani M, Ghasemian M, Inanloo M, Tohidast S J Chiropr Med. 2024; 23(3):102-113.

PMID: 39670205 PMC: 11632699. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2024.05.002.


Ultrasound Evaluation of Onset Core Muscle Activity in Subjects with Non-Specific Lower Back Pain and Without Lower Back Pain: An Observational Case-Control Study.

Cervera-Cano M, Valcarcel-Linares D, Fernandez-Carnero S, Lopez-Gonzalez L, Lazaro-Navas I, Pecos-Martin D Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(20).

PMID: 39451633 PMC: 11506778. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14202310.


Trunk muscles' characteristics in adolescent gymnasts with low back pain: a pilot study on the effects of a physiotherapy intervention including a postural reeducation program.

Deodato M, Saponaro S, Simunic B, Martini M, Murena L, Buoite Stella A J Man Manip Ther. 2023; 32(3):310-324.

PMID: 37649443 PMC: 11216269. DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2023.2252202.


Real-time ultrasound evaluation of CORE muscle activity in a simultaneous contraction in subjects with non-specific low back pain and without low-back pain. Protocol of an observational case-control study.

Cervera-Cano M, Saez-Garcia M, Valcarcel-Linares D, Fernandez-Carnero S, Lopez-Gonzalez L, Gallego-Izquierdo T PLoS One. 2023; 18(8):e0285441.

PMID: 37561752 PMC: 10414640. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285441.