» Articles » PMID: 24901691

The Disappointing Quality of Published Studies on Operative Techniques for Rectovaginal Fistulas: a Blueprint for a Prospective Multi-institutional Study

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2014 Jun 6
PMID 24901691
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Treatment of rectovaginal fistulas is difficult, and many surgical interventions have been developed. The best surgical intervention for the closure of these fistulas is still unclear.

Objective: A systematic review was performed reporting the outcomes of different surgical techniques for rectovaginal fistulas.

Data Sources: Medline (PubMed, Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible articles as well as the references of these articles.

Study Selection: Two independent reviewers analyzed the search results for eligible articles based on title, abstract, and described results.

Intervention(s): Any surgical intervention for the closure of rectovaginal fistulas was included.

Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome was closure rate. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, morbidity, and the effect on sexual functioning.

Results: Many articles with different operative techniques were identified and classified in the following categories: advancement flaps (endorectal and endovaginal), transperineal closure, Martius procedure, gracilis muscle transposition, rectal resections, transabdominal closure, mesh repair, plugs, endoscopic repairs, closure with biomaterials, and miscellaneous techniques. Results vary widely with closure rates between 0% and >80%. None of the studies were randomized. Because of the poor quality of the identified studies, the comparison of results and performance of a meta-analysis were not possible.Data regarding the secondary outcomes were mostly unavailable.

Limitations: The major limitation of this review was the limited availability of high-quality prospective studies, making it impossible to perform a meta-analysis.

Conclusions: No conclusion about the best surgical intervention for rectovaginal fistulas could be formulated. More large studies of high quality are needed to find the best treatment for rectovaginal fistulas. A design for these high-quality studies was formulated.

Citing Articles

A Gender Perspective on Coloproctological Diseases: A Narrative Review on Female Disorders.

De Nardi P, Giacomel G, Orlandi S, Poli G, Pozzo M, Rinaldi M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458086 PMC: 11508386. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206136.


[Rectovaginal fistulas : Differentiated diagnostics and treatment].

Schwandner O Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2024; 95(12):1027-1040.

PMID: 39283323 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-024-02151-5.


Combined clinical and radiological remission of rectovaginal fistulas using fractional CO2 vaginal laser: a case series and medium-term follow-up.

Drumond D, Conde C, Chebli J, Chebli L, Esperanca S, de Gois Speck N BMC Res Notes. 2023; 16(1):371.

PMID: 38115124 PMC: 10729484. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06666-8.


Perioperative Factors Affecting the Healing of Rectovaginal Fistula.

Satora M, Zak K, Frankowska K, Misiek M, Tarkowski R, Bobinski M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(19).

PMID: 37835064 PMC: 10573987. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12196421.


Delayed surgical management of rectovaginal fistula: a case report highlighting challenges and lessons learned.

Drusany Staric K, Distefano R, Campo G, Norcic G Front Surg. 2023; 10:1260355.

PMID: 37693638 PMC: 10483572. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1260355.