» Articles » PMID: 24894571

Detoxification of Implant Surfaces Affected by Peri-Implant Disease: An Overview of Non-surgical Methods

Overview
Journal Open Dent J
Publisher Bentham Open
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2014 Jun 5
PMID 24894571
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this review is to summarize the findings of studies that have evaluated non-surgical approaches for detoxification of implant body surfaces in vitro and in vivo, and to evaluate clinical trials on the use of these methodologies for treating peri-implant disease.

Materials And Methods: A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (Pubmed) from 1966 to 2013. In vitro and in vivo studies as well as clinical trials on non-surgical therapy were evaluated. The outcome variables were the ability of the therapeutic method to eliminate the biofilm and endotoxins from the implant surface, the changes in clinical parameters including probing depth, clinical attachment levels, bleeding on probing; radiographic bone fill and histological re-osseointegration.

Results: From 134 articles found 35 were analyzed. The findings, advantages and disadvantages of using lasers as well as mechanical and chemical methods are discussed. Most of the in vivo and human studies used combination therapies which makes determining the efficacy of one specific method difficult. Most human studies are case series with short term longitudinal analysis without survival or failure reports.

Conclusion: Complete elimination of the biofilms is difficult to achieve using these approaches. All therapies induce changes of the chemical and physical properties of the implant surface. Re-osseointegration may be difficult to achieve if not impossible without surgical access to ensure thorough debridement of the defect and detoxification of the implant surface. Combination protocols for non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis in humans have shown some positive clinical results but long-term evaluation to evaluate the validity and reliability of the techniques is needed.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy of 810 nm diode laser and photodynamic therapy in reducing microbial flora in patients with peri-implant mucositis - An in vivo study.

Siwach P, Sanan R, Nagpal A, Shetty O, Bhardwaj A, Sharma M J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2025; 25(1):40-45.

PMID: 39750007 PMC: 11853942. DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_64_24.


Observation of peri-implant bone loss rates in patients visiting dentist-A retrospective evaluation of patients of a faculty hospital for one year.

Karadag I, Kurnaz H, Akkaya M, Karadag I, Konukcu Kurnaz Z PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18643.

PMID: 39670096 PMC: 11636533. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18643.


Microbiological and Imaging-Based Evaluations of Photodynamic Therapy Combined with Er:YAG Laser Therapy in the In Vitro Decontamination of Titanium and Zirconia Surfaces.

Munteanu I, Luca R, Hogea E, Erdelyi R, Duma V, Marsavina L Microorganisms. 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39065113 PMC: 11278944. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12071345.


Management of peri-implantitis using local drug delivery among Indian patients.

Khare S, Doda H, Dubey V, Sutaria S, Nath S, Bhatt D Bioinformation. 2024; 19(13):1301-1306.

PMID: 38415045 PMC: 10895527. DOI: 10.6026/973206300191301.


Physical-chemical influences and cell behavior of natural compounds on titanium dental surfaces.

Maquera-Huacho P, de Carvalho G, Jafelicci Junior M, Marcantonio Junior E, Palomari Spolidorio D Braz Dent J. 2023; 34(5):53-62.

PMID: 38133473 PMC: 10759949. DOI: 10.1590/0103-6440202305582.


References
1.
Valderrama P, Wilson Jr T . Detoxification of implant surfaces affected by peri-implant disease: an overview of surgical methods. Int J Dent. 2013; 2013:740680. PMC: 3747607. DOI: 10.1155/2013/740680. View

2.
Persson G, Salvi G, Heitz-Mayfield L, Lang N . Antimicrobial therapy using a local drug delivery system (Arestin) in the treatment of peri-implantitis. I: Microbiological outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(4):386-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01269.x. View

3.
Froum S, Rosen P . A proposed classification for peri-implantitis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012; 32(5):533-40. View

4.
Rodrigues D, Urban R, Jacobs J, Gilbert J . In vivo severe corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement of retrieved modular body titanium alloy hip-implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008; 88(1):206-19. PMC: 2667129. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31171. View

5.
Rimondini L, Cicognani Simoncini F, Carrassi A . Micro-morphometric assessment of titanium plasma-sprayed coating removal using burs for the treatment of peri-implant disease. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 11(2):129-38. View