» Articles » PMID: 24887571

Report of the NIH Task Force on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled: Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed nonspecific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. Therefore, NIH Pain Consortium charged a research task force to draft standards for research on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimum data set to describe research participants (drawing heavily on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future research and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved the recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals. The research task force believes that these recommendations will advance the field, help resolve controversies, and facilitate future research addressing the genomic, neurological, and other mechanistic substrates of cLBP. We expect that the research task force recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement.

Perspective: A task force was convened by the NIH Pain Consortium with the goal of developing research standards for cLBP. The results included recommendations for definitions, a minimum data set, reporting outcomes, and future research. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes.

Citing Articles

Development and Initial Validation of Mindfulness-Based Pain Reduction (MBPR) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

Mehling W, Brintz C, Hartogensis W, Wolf C, Rogers K, Adler S J Pain Res. 2025; 18:785-801.

PMID: 39991526 PMC: 11846508. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S507003.


Multi-ancestry meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies discovers 67 new loci associated with chronic back pain.

Stanaway I, Suri P, Afari N, Dochtermann D, Gerstenberger A, Pyarajan S Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1525.

PMID: 39934103 PMC: 11814113. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-55326-3.


Investigation of the effects of different treatment approaches on lumbar stabilizer muscles and diaphragm motility in individuals with chronic low back pain.

Kanli K, Yigitoglu P, Ozgul A Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024; 70(3):358-369.

PMID: 39679113 PMC: 11639492. DOI: 10.5606/tftrd.2024.13257.


Mind your pain: A single-arm feasibility study to assess a smartphone-based interoceptive attention training for patients with chronic low back pain.

Mehling W, Strigo I, Goldman V, Hartogensis W, Adler S, Lotz J PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0307690.

PMID: 39446767 PMC: 11500934. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307690.


Pain neuroscience education improves post-traumatic stress disorder, disability, and pain self-efficacy in veterans and service members with chronic low back pain: Preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up.

Benedict T, Nitz A, Gambrel M, Louw A Mil Psychol. 2024; 36(4):376-392.

PMID: 38913769 PMC: 11197901. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2023.2188046.