» Articles » PMID: 24887101

High Dose Tigecycline in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Infections Due to Multidrug-resistant Bacteria

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2014 Jun 3
PMID 24887101
Citations 95
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The high incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among patients admitted to ICUs has determined an increase of tigecycline (TGC) use for the treatment of severe infections. Many concerns have been raised about the efficacy of this molecule and increased dosages have been proposed. Our purpose is to investigate TGC safety and efficacy at higher than standard doses.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of prospectively collected data in the ICU of a teaching hospital in Rome. Data from all patients treated with TGC for a microbiologically confirmed infection were analyzed. The safety profile and efficacy of high dosing regimen use were investigated.

Results: Over the study period, 54 patients (pts) received TGC at a standard dose (SD group: 50 mg every 12 hours) and 46 at a high dose (HD group: 100 mg every 12 hours). Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter.baumannii (blaOXA-58 and blaOXA-23 genes) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (blaKPC-3 gene) were the main isolated pathogens (n = 79). There were no patients requiring TGC discontinuation or dose reduction because of adverse events. In the ventilation-associated pneumonia population (VAP) subgroup (63 patients: 30 received SD and 33 HD), the only independent predictor of clinical cure was the use of high tigecycline dose (odds ratio (OR) 6.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59 to 24.57; P = 0.009) whilst initial inadequate antimicrobial treatment (IIAT) (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.68; P = 0.01) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.87; P = 0.003) were independently associated with clinical failure.

Conclusions: TGC was well tolerated at a higher than standard dose in a cohort of critically ill patients with severe infections. In the VAP subgroup the high-dose regimen was associated with better outcomes than conventional administration due to Gram-negative MDR bacteria.

Citing Articles

Clinical and microbiological analysis of risk factors for breakthrough bloodstream infection during Tigecycline Therapy.

Jin S, Lim S, Lee Y, Sung H, Kim M, Bae S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4266.

PMID: 39905181 PMC: 11794583. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88048-7.


Tetracycline and chloramphenicol exposure induce decreased susceptibility to tigecycline and genetic alterations in AcrAB-TolC efflux pump regulators in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Nasralddin N, Haeili M, Karimzadeh S, Alsahlani F PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0315847.

PMID: 39841693 PMC: 11753663. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315847.


Carbapenem-resistant raises global alarm for new antibiotic regimens.

Thacharodi A, Vithlani A, Hassan S, Alqahtani A, Pugazhendhi A iScience. 2024; 27(12):111367.

PMID: 39650735 PMC: 11625361. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111367.


Evaluating Risk Factors for Clinical Failure Among Tigecycline-Treated Patients.

Huang C, Yang J, Chuang Y, Sheng W Infect Drug Resist. 2024; 17:5387-5393.

PMID: 39649431 PMC: 11625427. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S496809.


Treatment Approaches for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections.

Iovleva A, Fowler Jr V, Doi Y Drugs. 2024; 85(1):21-40.

PMID: 39607595 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02104-6.


References
1.
Bradford P, Bratu S, Urban C, Visalli M, Mariano N, Landman D . Emergence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella species possessing the class A carbapenem-hydrolyzing KPC-2 and inhibitor-resistant TEM-30 beta-lactamases in New York City. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39(1):55-60. DOI: 10.1086/421495. View

2.
Solomkin J, Mazuski J, Bradley J, Rodvold K, Goldstein E, Baron E . Diagnosis and management of complicated intra-abdominal infection in adults and children: guidelines by the Surgical Infection Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 50(2):133-64. DOI: 10.1086/649554. View

3.
Dellinger R, Levy M, Carlet J, Bion J, Parker M, Jaeschke R . Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Med. 2007; 34(1):17-60. PMC: 2249616. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2. View

4.
Sbrana F, Malacarne P, Viaggi B, Costanzo S, Leonetti P, Leonildi A . Carbapenem-sparing antibiotic regimens for infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae in intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 56(5):697-700. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis969. View

5.
Barbour A, Schmidt S, Ma B, Schiefelbein L, Rand K, Burkhardt O . Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tigecycline. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009; 48(9):575-84. DOI: 10.2165/11317100-000000000-00000. View