» Articles » PMID: 24885295

A Comparison of Performance of Plant MiRNA Target Prediction Tools and the Characterization of Features for Genome-wide Target Prediction

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2014 Jun 3
PMID 24885295
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Deep-sequencing has enabled the identification of large numbers of miRNAs and siRNAs, making the high-throughput target identification a main limiting factor in defining their function. In plants, several tools have been developed to predict targets, majority of them being trained on Arabidopsis datasets. An extensive and systematic evaluation has not been made for their suitability for predicting targets in species other than Arabidopsis. Nor, these have not been evaluated for their suitability for high-throughput target prediction at genome level.

Results: We evaluated the performance of 11 computational tools in identifying genome-wide targets in Arabidopsis and other plants with procedures that optimized score-cutoffs for estimating targets. Targetfinder was most efficient [89% 'precision' (accuracy of prediction), 97% 'recall' (sensitivity)] in predicting 'true-positive' targets in Arabidopsis miRNA-mRNA interactions. In contrast, only 46% of true positive interactions from non-Arabidopsis species were detected, indicating low 'recall' values. Score optimizations increased the 'recall' to only 70% (corresponding 'precision': 65%) for datasets of true miRNA-mRNA interactions in species other than Arabidopsis. Combining the results of Targetfinder and psRNATarget delivers high true positive coverage, whereas the intersection of psRNATarget and Tapirhybrid outputs deliver highly 'precise' predictions. The large number of 'false negative' predictions delivered from non-Arabidopsis datasets by all the available tools indicate the diversity in miRNAs-mRNA interaction features between Arabidopsis and other species. A subset of miRNA-mRNA interactions differed significantly for features in seed regions as well as the total number of matches/mismatches.

Conclusion: Although, many plant miRNA target prediction tools may be optimized to predict targets with high specificity in Arabidopsis, such optimized thresholds may not be suitable for many targets in non-Arabidopsis species. More importantly, non-conventional features of miRNA-mRNA interaction may exist in plants indicating alternate mode of miRNA target recognition. Incorporation of these divergent features would enable next-generation of algorithms to better identify target interactions.

Citing Articles

MicroRNAs in Plant Genetic Regulation of Drought Tolerance and Their Function in Enhancing Stress Adaptation.

Zhakypbek Y, Belkozhayev A, Kerimkulova A, Kossalbayev B, Murat T, Tursbekov S Plants (Basel). 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39942972 PMC: 11820447. DOI: 10.3390/plants14030410.


Plant miR6262 Modulates the Expression of Metabolic and Thermogenic Genes in Human Hepatocytes and Adipocytes.

Diez-Sainz E, Milagro F, Aranaz P, Riezu-Boj J, Lorente-Cebrian S Nutrients. 2024; 16(18).

PMID: 39339747 PMC: 11435339. DOI: 10.3390/nu16183146.


Targeting Metabolic Syndrome Pathways: Carrot microRNAs As Potential Modulators.

Reza-Zaldivar E, Jacobo-Velazquez D ACS Omega. 2024; 9(20):21891-21903.

PMID: 38799337 PMC: 11112692. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c09633.


Plant miR8126-3p and miR8126-5p Decrease Lipid Accumulation through Modulation of Metabolic Genes in a Human Hepatocyte Model That Mimics Steatosis.

Diez-Sainz E, Aranaz P, Amri E, Riezu-Boj J, Lorente-Cebrian S, Milagro F Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(3).

PMID: 38338999 PMC: 10855419. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25031721.


miR482f and miR482c-5p from edible plant-derived foods inhibit the expression of pro-inflammatory genes in human THP-1 macrophages.

Diez-Sainz E, Lorente-Cebrian S, Aranaz P, Amri E, Riezu-Boj J, Milagro F Front Nutr. 2023; 10:1287312.

PMID: 38099184 PMC: 10719859. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1287312.


References
1.
DSouza M, Larsen N, Overbeek R . Searching for patterns in genomic data. Trends Genet. 1998; 13(12):497-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01347-4. View

2.
Voinnet O . Origin, biogenesis, and activity of plant microRNAs. Cell. 2009; 136(4):669-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.046. View

3.
Zhang Y . miRU: an automated plant miRNA target prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(Web Server issue):W701-4. PMC: 1160144. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki383. View

4.
Pantaleo V, Szittya G, Moxon S, Miozzi L, Moulton V, Dalmay T . Identification of grapevine microRNAs and their targets using high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. Plant J. 2010; 62(6):960-76. DOI: 10.1111/j.0960-7412.2010.04208.x. View

5.
Garcia D, Baek D, Shin C, Bell G, Grimson A, Bartel D . Weak seed-pairing stability and high target-site abundance decrease the proficiency of lsy-6 and other microRNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011; 18(10):1139-46. PMC: 3190056. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2115. View