» Articles » PMID: 24885167

Attitudes of Medical Students Towards Incentives Offered by Pharmaceutical Companies -- Perspective from a Developing Nation -- a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal BMC Med Ethics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2014 Jun 3
PMID 24885167
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A training physician has his first interaction with a pharmaceutical representative during medical school. Medical students are often provided with small gifts such as pens, calendars and books, as well as free lunches as part of drug promotion offers. Ethical impact of these transactions as perceived by young medical students has not been investigated in Pakistan before. This study aimed to assess the association of socio-demographic variables with the attitudes of medical students towards pharmaceutical companies and their incentives.

Methods: As part of a cross-sectional survey, a validated questionnaire previously used for assessing attitude of medical students towards pharmaceutical industry, was modified, pre-tested and distributed among consenting clinical year students at DUHS and AKU. Questions included acceptability of pharmaceutically sponsored gifts, events and tuition fee, and their impact on future prescription. Responses were graded as agree, disagree or neutral which were then scored according to the AMSA guidelines of ethical conduct.

Results: Out of a total of 353 targeted students 303 responded, corresponding to a response rate of 85.8%. Responses indicated that 42.7% students believed in no interaction with drug companies during medical school. However, 81% of students favored pharmaceutical sponsorship of student-body events/seminars at medical colleges. More than one-third of the students were comfortable receiving gifts from drug companies. Overall, the results of this study offer an interesting comparison between the students of a private medical school (AKU) and a public medical school (DUHS); AKU students exhibited a greater degree of mistrust towards drug information provided by pharmaceutical companies compared to DUHS students (p = 0.040). Furthermore, when asked if there was a need to incorporate guidelines in the undergraduate curriculum with regard to interaction with drug companies, 84.2% students at AKU agreed, compared to 54.9% at DUHS. Medical student Attitude Scores are more or less similar to each other independent of their various demographical differences.

Conclusion: This study highlights that medical students in our population have a high level of acceptability towards incentives offered by pharmaceutical industry and that formal guidance regarding the subject should be incorporated into medical curriculum.

Citing Articles

Cross-sectional assessment of perception and attitude of pharmacy students towards pharmaceutical promotion: a study from developing country, Pakistan.

Gillani A, Arshad H, Arshed M, Jairoun A, Shukar S, Akbar J Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1424352.

PMID: 39554505 PMC: 11566137. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1424352.


Effect of pharmaceutical promotion and incentives offered by pharmaceutical companies on the prescribing pattern of medical students: a cross-sectional study from a developing nation Pakistan.

Gillani A, Arshad H, Umer M, Arshed M, Khan F, Bashir K Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1334518.

PMID: 38846143 PMC: 11153857. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1334518.


Physician's perceptions regarding the pharmaceutical industry: a Brazilian national study.

Gameiro G, Gameiro G, Silva R, Guilloux A, Cassenote A, Scheffer M Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024; 70(5):e20231317.

PMID: 38775504 PMC: 11111120. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20231317.


Views and Perceptions of Medical Representatives and Physicians about the Role of Medical Representatives and Pharmaceutical Advertisement in Saudi Arabia - A Pilot Study.

Faqeh S, Alansari S, Althagafi A, Abdulaziz A, Alhajjaji A, Kurdi A J Res Pharm Pract. 2023; 11(4):127-135.

PMID: 37969614 PMC: 10642585. DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_65_22.


Impact of a multifaceted intervention on physicians' knowledge, attitudes and practices in relation to pharmaceutical incentivisation: protocol for a randomised control trial.

Noor M, Khan M, Rahman-Shepherd A, Siddiqui A, Khan S, Azam I BMJ Open. 2022; 12(11):e067233.

PMID: 36332959 PMC: 9639112. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067233.


References
1.
Wilkes M, Hoffman J . An innovative approach to educating medical students about pharmaceutical promotion. Acad Med. 2001; 76(12):1271-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200112000-00026. View

2.
Lexchin J . Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: what does the literature say?. CMAJ. 1993; 149(10):1401-7. PMC: 1485922. View

3.
Bellin M, McCarthy S, Drevlow L, Pierach C . Medical students' exposure to pharmaceutical industry marketing: a survey at one U.S. medical school. Acad Med. 2004; 79(11):1041-5. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200411000-00005. View

4.
Monaghan M, Galt K, Turner P, Houghton B, Rich E, Markert R . Student understanding of the relationship between the health professions and the pharmaceutical industry. Teach Learn Med. 2003; 15(1):14-20. DOI: 10.1207/S15328015TLM1501_04. View

5.
Soyk C, Pfefferkorn B, McBride P, Rieselbach R . Medical student exposure to and attitudes about pharmaceutical companies. WMJ. 2010; 109(3):142-8. View