» Articles » PMID: 24885132

Evaluating the Optimal Timing of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections are the most common hospital-acquired infections among surgical patients. The administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces the risk of surgical site infections . The optimal timing of this procedure is still a matter of debate. While most studies suggest that it should be given as close to the incision time as possible, others conclude that this may be too late for optimal prevention of surgical site infections. A large observational study suggests that surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis should be administered 74 to 30 minutes before surgery. The aim of this article is to report the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial investigating the optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Methods/design: In this bi-center randomized controlled trial conducted at two tertiary referral centers in Switzerland, we plan to include 5,000 patients undergoing general, oncologic, vascular and orthopedic trauma procedures. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: one receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (75 to 30 minutes before incision) and the other receiving surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room (less than 30 minutes before incision). We expect a significantly lower rate of surgical site infections with surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis administered more than 30 minutes before the scheduled incision. The primary outcome is the occurrence of surgical site infections during a 30-day follow-up period (one year with an implant in place). When assuming a 5% surgical site infection risk with administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the operating room, the planned sample size has an 80% power to detect a relative risk reduction for surgical site infections of 33% when administering surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the anesthesia room (with a two-sided type I error of 5%). We expect the study to be completed within three years.

Discussion: The results of this randomized controlled trial will have an important impact on current international guidelines for infection control strategies in the hospital. Moreover, the results of this randomized controlled trial are of significant interest for patient safety and healthcare economics.

Trial Registration: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT01790529.

Citing Articles

Moving Closer to Zero: Effect of "Just in Time" Dosing of Prophylactic Antibiotics on Surgical Site Infections.

Pardo J, Klinker K, Swift B, Borgert S, Gravenstein N Hosp Pharm. 2024; 51(1):44-48.

PMID: 38745708 PMC: 11089611. DOI: 10.1310/hpj5101-44.


The Role of HbA1c as a Positive Perioperative Predictor of Surgical Site and Other Postoperative Infections: An Explorative Analysis in Patients Undergoing Minor to Major Surgery.

Kopp Lugli A, Marti W, Salm L, Mujagic E, Bundi M, von Strauss M World J Surg. 2021; 46(2):391-399.

PMID: 34750659 PMC: 8724139. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06368-x.


Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy for closed laparotomy wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Boland P, Kelly M, Donlon N, Bolger J, Mehigan B, McCormick P Ir J Med Sci. 2020; 190(1):261-267.

PMID: 32588378 PMC: 7315908. DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02283-7.


Comparison of Bayesian and frequentist group-sequential clinical trial designs.

Stallard N, Todd S, Ryan E, Gates S BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20(1):4.

PMID: 31910813 PMC: 6947872. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0892-8.


Prophylactic negative wound therapy in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL trial): randomized controlled trial.

Donlon N, Boland P, Kelly M, Schmidt K, Cooke F, Neary P Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019; 34(11):2003-2010.

PMID: 31529194 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03398-9.


References
1.
Davies A, LOCKLEY R, Jones A, Clothier J . Comparative pharmacokinetics of cefamandole, cefuroxime and cephradine during total hip replacement. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986; 17(5):637-40. DOI: 10.1093/jac/17.5.637. View

2.
Bratzler D, Houck P . Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 38(12):1706-15. DOI: 10.1086/421095. View

3.
Hollenbeak C, Murphy D, Koenig S, Woodward R, Dunagan W, Fraser V . The clinical and economic impact of deep chest surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Chest. 2000; 118(2):397-402. DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.2.397. View

4.
Misteli H, Widmer A, Rosenthal R, Oertli D, Marti W, Weber W . Spectrum of pathogens in surgical site infections at a Swiss university hospital. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011; 140:w13146. DOI: 10.4414/smw.2011.13146. View

5.
Nygaard K, Hognestad J . Infection prophylaxis with doxycycline in colorectal surgery. A preliminary report. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1980; 59:37-9. View