» Articles » PMID: 24884985

No Global Consensus: a Cross-sectional Survey of Maternal Weight Policies

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2014 Jun 3
PMID 24884985
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Growing evidence suggests that maternal prepregnancy weight and gestational weight gain are risk factors for perinatal complications and subsequent maternal and child health. Postpartum weight retention is also associated with adverse birth outcomes and maternal obesity. Clinical guidelines addressing healthy weight before, during, and after pregnancy have been introduced in some countries, but at present a systematic accounting for these policies has not been conducted. The objective of the present study was to conduct a cross-national comparison of maternal weight guidelines.

Methods: This cross sectional survey administered a questionnaire online to key informants with expertise on the subject of maternal weight to assess the presence and content of preconceptional, pregnancy and postpartum maternal weight guidelines, their rationale and availability. We searched 195 countries, identified potential informants in 80 and received surveys representing 66 countries. We estimated the proportion of countries with guidelines by region, income, and formal or informal policy, and described and compared guideline content, including a rubric to assess presence or absence of 4 guidelines: encourage healthy preconceptional weight, antenatal weighing, encourage appropriate gestational gain, and encourage attainment of healthy postpartum weight.

Results: Fifty-three countries reported either a formal or informal policy regarding maternal weight. The majority of these policies included guidelines to assess maternal weight at the first prenatal visit (90%), to monitor gestational weight gain during pregnancy (81%), and to provide recommendations to women about healthy gestational weight gain (62%). Guidelines related to preconceptional (42%) and postpartum (13%) weight were less common. Only 8% of countries reported policies that included all 4 fundamental guidelines. Guideline content and rationale varied considerably between countries, and respondents perceived that within their country, policies were not widely known.

Conclusions: These results suggest that maternal weight is a concern throughout the world. However, we found a lack of international consensus on the content of guidelines. Further research is needed to understand which recommendations or interventions work best with respect to maternal weight in different country settings, and how pregnancy weight policies impact clinical practices and health outcomes for the mother and child.

Citing Articles

Methods for modeling gestational weight gain: empirical application using electronic health record data from a safety net population.

Booman A, Vesco K, Springer R, Dinh D, Liu S, Lyon-Scott K BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):35.

PMID: 39825224 PMC: 11740392. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07139-5.


Maternal obesity management: a narrative literature review of health policies.

Kalantari E, Tajvar M, Naderimagham S, Takian A BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):520.

PMID: 39294652 PMC: 11409689. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03342-2.


Implementation of Postpartum Nutritional Interventions in Healthcare, Community and eHealth: A Systematic Review.

Bernier E, Simoneau C, Desroches S, Morisset A, Robitaille J Matern Child Health J. 2024; 28(11):1897-1910.

PMID: 39292385 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-024-03985-5.


Optimizing perinatal wellbeing in pregnancy with obesity: a clinical trial with a multi-component nutrition intervention for prevention of gestational diabetes and infant growth and neurodevelopment impairment.

Perichart-Perera O, Reyes-Munoz E, Borboa-Olivares H, Rodriguez-Cano A, Solis Paredes J, Hernandez-Hernandez L Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1339428.

PMID: 38681052 PMC: 11045894. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1339428.


Antenatal care addressing gestational weight gain (GWG): a cross sectional study of pregnant women's reported receipt and acceptability of recommended GWG care and associated characteristics.

Hollis J, Deroover K, Licata M, Tully B, Farragher E, Lecathelinais C BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):111.

PMID: 38321389 PMC: 10845753. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-06158-4.


References
1.
Villamor E, Cnattingius S . Interpregnancy weight change and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006; 368(9542):1164-70. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69473-7. View

2.
Campbell F, Johnson M, Messina J, Guillaume L, Goyder E . Behavioural interventions for weight management in pregnancy: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative data. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11:491. PMC: 3154865. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-491. View

3.
Mardones F, Rosso P . A weight gain chart for pregnant women designed in Chile. Matern Child Nutr. 2006; 1(2):77-90. PMC: 6860947. DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2005.00013.x. View

4.
Black R, Victora C, Walker S, Bhutta Z, Christian P, de Onis M . Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013; 382(9890):427-451. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X. View

5.
Catalano P . Obesity and pregnancy--the propagation of a viscous cycle?. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 88(8):3505-6. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-031046. View