» Articles » PMID: 24884877

Clinician-led Improvement in Cancer Care (CLICC)--testing a Multifaceted Implementation Strategy to Increase Evidence-based Prostate Cancer Care: Phased Randomised Controlled Trial--study Protocol

Overview
Journal Implement Sci
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Health Services
Date 2014 Jun 3
PMID 24884877
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Clinical practice guidelines have been widely developed and disseminated with the aim of improving healthcare processes and patient outcomes but the uptake of evidence-based practice remains haphazard. There is a need to develop effective implementation methods to achieve large-scale adoption of proven innovations and recommended care. Clinical networks are increasingly being viewed as a vehicle through which evidence-based care can be embedded into healthcare systems using a collegial approach to agree on and implement a range of strategies within hospitals. In Australia, the provision of evidence-based care for men with prostate cancer has been identified as a high priority. Clinical audits have shown that fewer than 10% of patients in New South Wales (NSW) Australia at high risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy receive guideline recommended radiation treatment following surgery. This trial will test a clinical network-based intervention to improve uptake of guideline recommended care for men with high-risk prostate cancer.

Methods/design: In Phase I, a phased randomised cluster trial will test a multifaceted intervention that harnesses the NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation (ACI) Urology Clinical Network to increase evidence-based care for men with high-risk prostate cancer following surgery. The intervention will be introduced in nine NSW hospitals over 10 months using a stepped wedge design. Outcome data (referral to radiation oncology for discussion of adjuvant radiotherapy in line with guideline recommended care or referral to a clinical trial of adjuvant versus salvage radiotherapy) will be collected through review of patient medical records. In Phase II, mixed methods will be used to identify mechanisms of provider and organisational change. Clinicians' knowledge and attitudes will be assessed through surveys. Process outcome measures will be assessed through document review. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted to elucidate mechanisms of change.

Discussion: The study will be one of the first randomised controlled trials to test the effectiveness of clinical networks to lead changes in clinical practice in hospitals treating patients with high-risk cancer. It will additionally provide direction regarding implementation strategies that can be effectively employed to encourage widespread adoption of clinical practice guidelines.

Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12611001251910.

Citing Articles

Use of focal radiotherapy boost for prostate cancer: radiation oncologists' perspectives and perceived barriers to implementation.

Zhong A, Lui A, Katz M, Berlin A, Kamran S, Kishan A Radiat Oncol. 2023; 18(1):188.

PMID: 37950310 PMC: 10638743. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02375-5.


Sustainability, spread, and scale in trials using audit and feedback: a theory-informed, secondary analysis of a systematic review.

Laur C, Ladak Z, Hall A, Solbak N, Nathan N, Buzuayne S Implement Sci. 2023; 18(1):54.

PMID: 37885018 PMC: 10604689. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01312-0.


A Qualitative Force Field Analysis of Facilitators and Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice in Healthcare Using an Implementation Framework.

McNett M, Tucker S, Zadvinskis I, Tolles D, Thomas B, Gorsuch P Glob Implement Res Appl. 2022; 2(3):195-208.

PMID: 35974880 PMC: 9373890. DOI: 10.1007/s43477-022-00051-6.


Development, implementation and evaluation of a management specialization course in oncology using blended learning.

Fernandes R, Oliveira Lima J, da Silva B, Sales M, de Orange F BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20(1):37.

PMID: 32028935 PMC: 7006068. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-1957-4.


Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Flodgren G, OBrien M, Parmelli E, Grimshaw J Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 6:CD000125.

PMID: 31232458 PMC: 6589938. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000125.pub5.


References
1.
Rubenstein L, Pugh J . Strategies for promoting organizational and practice change by advancing implementation research. J Gen Intern Med. 2006; 21 Suppl 2:S58-64. PMC: 2557137. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00364.x. View

2.
Hakkennes S, Dodd K . Guideline implementation in allied health professions: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008; 17(4):296-300. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023804. View

3.
Buchan H, Sewell J, Sweet M . Translating evidence into practice. Med J Aust. 2004; 180(S6):S43. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05942.x. View

4.
Davis D, Taylor-Vaisey A . Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997; 157(4):408-16. PMC: 1227916. View

5.
Boxer M, Forstner D, Kneebone A, Delaney G, Koh E, Fuller M . Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2009; 53(4):405-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02096.x. View