» Articles » PMID: 24880235

Effect of Pulsed Electric Field Treatments on Permeabilization and Extraction of Pigments from Chlorella Vulgaris

Overview
Journal J Membr Biol
Date 2014 Jun 2
PMID 24880235
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of pulsed electric field (PEF) treatments of different intensities on the electroporation of the cytoplasmatic membrane of Chlorella vulgaris, and on the extraction of carotenoids and chlorophylls were investigated. Staining the cells with propidium iodide before and after the PEF treatment revealed the existence of reversible and irreversible electroporation. Application of PEF treatments in the range of 20-25 kV cm(-1) caused most of the population of C. vulgaris to be irreversibly electroporated even at short treatment times (5 pulses of 3 µs). However, at lower electric field strengths (10 kV cm(-1)), cells that were reversibly electroporated were observed even after 50 pulses of 3 µs. The electroporation of C. vulgaris cells by PEF higher than 15 kV cm(-1) and duration is higher than 15 µs increased significantly the extraction yield of intracellular components of C. vulgaris. The application of a 20 kV cm(-1) for 75 μs increased the extraction yield just after the PEF treatment of the carotenoids, and chlorophylls a and b 0.5, 0.7, and 0.8 times, respectively. However, further increments in electric field strength and treatment time did not cause significant increments in the extraction yield. The extraction of carotenoids from PEF-treated C. vulgaris cells after 1 h of the application of the treatment significantly increased the extraction yield in comparison to the yield obtained from the cells extracted just after the PEF treatment. After PEF treatment at 20 kV cm(-1) for 75 µs, extraction yield for carotenoids, and chlorophylls a and b increased 1.2, 1.6, and 2.1 times, respectively. A high correlation was observed between irreversible electroporation and percentage of yield increase when the extraction was conducted after 1 h of the application of PEF treatment (R: 0.93), but not when the extraction was conducted just after PEF treatment (R: 0.67).

Citing Articles

Biphasic lipid extraction from microalgae after PEF-treatment reduces the energy demand of the downstream process.

Papachristou I, Nazarova N, Wustner R, Lina R, Frey W, Silve A Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2025; 18(1):12.

PMID: 39875923 PMC: 11776281. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-025-02608-7.


Pulsed electric field (PEF) processing of microalga Chlorella vulgaris and its digestibility in broiler feed.

Van Nerom S, Buyse K, Van Immerseel F, Robbens J, Delezie E Poult Sci. 2024; 103(6):103721.

PMID: 38613915 PMC: 11636916. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103721.


Sustainable Green Extraction of Carotenoid Pigments: Innovative Technologies and Bio-Based Solvents.

Moron-Ortiz A, Mapelli-Brahm P, Melendez-Martinez A Antioxidants (Basel). 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38397837 PMC: 10886214. DOI: 10.3390/antiox13020239.


Microbial Pigments: Major Groups and Industrial Applications.

Barreto J, Casanova L, Junior A, Pinheiro Pereira Reis-Mansur M, Vermelho A Microorganisms. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38138065 PMC: 10745774. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11122920.


Sustainable Production of Pigments from Cyanobacteria.

Deepika C, Wolf J, Roles J, Ross I, Hankamer B Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2022; 183:171-251.

PMID: 36571616 DOI: 10.1007/10_2022_211.


References
1.
Cheng C, Du T, Pi H, Jang S, Lin Y, Lee H . Comparative study of lipid extraction from microalgae by organic solvent and supercritical CO2. Bioresour Technol. 2011; 102(21):10151-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.064. View

2.
Aronsson K, Ronner U, Borch E . Inactivation of Escherichia coli, Listeria innocua and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in relation to membrane permeabilization and subsequent leakage of intracellular compounds due to pulsed electric field processing. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005; 99(1):19-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.07.012. View

3.
Garcia D, Gomez N, Manas P, Raso J, Pagan R . Pulsed electric fields cause bacterial envelopes permeabilization depending on the treatment intensity, the treatment medium pH and the microorganism investigated. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006; 113(2):219-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.07.007. View

4.
Vanthoor-Koopmans M, Wijffels R, Barbosa M, Eppink M . Biorefinery of microalgae for food and fuel. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 135:142-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.135. View

5.
Balasundaram B, Harrison S, Bracewell D . Advances in product release strategies and impact on bioprocess design. Trends Biotechnol. 2009; 27(8):477-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.04.004. View