» Articles » PMID: 24876947

Salient Distractors Can Induce Saccade Adaptation

Overview
Journal J Ophthalmol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2014 May 31
PMID 24876947
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When saccadic eye movements consistently fail to land on their intended target, saccade accuracy is maintained by gradually adapting the movement size of successive saccades. The proposed error signal for saccade adaptation has been based on the distance between where the eye lands and the visual target (retinal error). We studied whether the error signal could alternatively be based on the distance between the predicted and actual locus of attention after the saccade. Unlike conventional adaptation experiments that surreptitiously displace the target once a saccade is initiated towards it, we instead attempted to draw attention away from the target by briefly presenting salient distractor images on one side of the target after the saccade. To test whether less salient, more predictable distractors would induce less adaptation, we separately used fixed random noise distractors. We found that both visual attention distractors were able to induce a small degree of downward saccade adaptation but significantly more to the more salient distractors. As in conventional adaptation experiments, upward adaptation was less effective and salient distractors did not significantly increase amplitudes. We conclude that the locus of attention after the saccade can act as an error signal for saccade adaptation.

Citing Articles

Interaction of dynamic error signals in saccade adaptation.

Wagner I, Schutz A J Neurophysiol. 2023; 129(3):717-732.

PMID: 36791071 PMC: 10027077. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00419.2022.


Flexible use of post-saccadic visual feedback in oculomotor learning.

Heins F, Lappe M J Vis. 2022; 22(1):3.

PMID: 34994785 PMC: 8742532. DOI: 10.1167/jov.22.1.3.


Inducing oculomotor plasticity to disclose the functional link between voluntary saccades and endogenous attention deployed perifoveally.

Nicolas J, Bidet-Caulet A, Pelisson D Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):17770.

PMID: 31780727 PMC: 6882914. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54256-1.


Effects of visual distractors on vergence eye movements.

Yaramothu C, Santos E, Alvarez T J Vis. 2018; 18(6):2.

PMID: 30029212 PMC: 5987826. DOI: 10.1167/18.6.2.


Saccadic Adaptation Alters the Attentional Field.

Wick F, Garaas T, Pomplun M Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:568.

PMID: 27899887 PMC: 5110509. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00568.


References
1.
Cavanagh P, Hunt A, Afraz A, Rolfs M . Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010; 14(4):147-53. PMC: 2847621. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.007. View

2.
Noto C, ROBINSON F . Visual error is the stimulus for saccade gain adaptation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001; 12(2):301-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00062-3. View

3.
Castet E, Jeanjean S, Montagnini A, Laugier D, Masson G . Dynamics of attentional deployment during saccadic programming. J Vis. 2006; 6(3):196-212. DOI: 10.1167/6.3.2. View

4.
Soetedjo R, Fuchs A, Kojima Y . Subthreshold activation of the superior colliculus drives saccade motor learning. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(48):15213-22. PMC: 2828496. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4296-09.2009. View

5.
Awh E, Armstrong K, Moore T . Visual and oculomotor selection: links, causes and implications for spatial attention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 10(3):124-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.001. View