Evaluation of Non Diseased Specified Outcome Measures in Hand Injuries to Assess Activity and Participation Based on ICF Content

Overview

Journal J Hand Microsurg

Date 2014 May 31

PMID 24876687

Citations 7

Authors

Maryam Farzad

Fereydoun Layeghi

Ali Asgari

Seyed Ali Hosseini

Mehdi Rassafiani

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The objective of the study is to provide information about non disease specified outcome measures which evaluate disability in patients who have impairments in hand and upper extremity and to find the extent to which they are evaluating "disability" based on ICF hand Core Set (activity limitation and participation restriction). MEDLINE, CINAHL, GOOGLE SCHOLAR , OVID and SCIENCE DIRECT databases were systematically searched for studies on non disease specified outcome measures used to evaluate upper extremity function; only studies written in English were considered. We reviewed titles and abstracts of the identified studies to determine whether the studies met predefined eligibility criteria (eg, non disease specified out come measures used in hand injured patients). All the outcome measures which had eligibility included. After full text review ,7 non disease specified outcome measures in hand were identified. Studies were extracted, and the information retrieved from them. All the outcome measures which had incuded, were linked with ICF hand core set disability part (activity and participation). All of them only linked to 16 (42 %) components of ICF hand Core Set, which were most activity and less participation from ICF. None of the non disease specified out come measures in hand injuries cover all domains of disability from the ICF Hand Core Set.

Citing Articles

Design, development and evaluation of registry software for upper limb disabilities.

Moulaei K, Sheikhtaheri A, Haghdoost A, Nezhad M, Bahaadinbeigy K Healthc Technol Lett. 2024; 11(6):496-503.

PMID: 39720749 PMC: 11665789. DOI: 10.1049/htl2.12115.

A data set for the design and implementation of the upper limb disability registry.

Moulaei K, Sheikhtaheri A, Haghdoost A, Nezhadd M, Bahaadinbeigy K J Educ Health Promot. 2023; 12:130.

PMID: 37397108 PMC: 10312779. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_721_22.

Factor structure of Participation Behavioural Questionnaire (PBQ) in patients with hand injuries.

Farzad M, MacDermid J, Rassafiani M PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0267872.

PMID: 36662736 PMC: 9858033. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267872.

Validation of Persian Version of Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation: Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Rasch Analysis.

Farzad M, MacDermid J, Lu Z, Shafiee E Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021; 2(4):100076.

PMID: 33543101 PMC: 7853362. DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100076.

Are the Domains Considered by ICF Comprehensive Enough to Conceptualize Participation in the Patient with Hand Injuries?.

Farzad M, Layeghi F, Hosseini S, Hamidreza K, Asgari A J Hand Microsurg. 2018; 9(3):139-153.

PMID: 29302138 PMC: 5741402. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608693.

References

Jette A, Haley S, Kooyoomjian J . Are the ICF Activity and Participation dimensions distinct?. J Rehabil Med. 2003; 35(3):145-9. DOI: 10.1080/16501970310010501. View

Hudak P, Amadio P, Bombardier C . Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29(6):602-8. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L. View

Jerosch-Herold C, Mason R, Chojnowski A . A qualitative study of the experiences and expectations of surgery in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Ther. 2008; 21(1):54-61. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.09.001. View

Perenboom R, Chorus A . Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25(11-12):577-87. DOI: 10.1080/0963828031000137081. View

Whiteneck G, Dijkers M . Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009; 90(11 Suppl):S22-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.009. View

NAGI S . An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1976; 54(4):439-67. View

Naidu S, Panchik D, Chinchilli V . Development and validation of the hand assessment tool. J Hand Ther. 2009; 22(3):250-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2008.11.003. View

Chung K, Pillsbury M, Walters M, Hayward R . Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am. 1998; 23(4):575-87. DOI: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80042-7. View

Szabo R . Outcomes assessment in hand surgery: when are they meaningful?. J Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26(6):993-1002. DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.2001.29487. View

10.

Dias J, Bhowal B, Wildin C, Thompson J . Assessing the outcome of disorders of the hand. Is the patient evaluation measure reliable, valid, responsive and without bias?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001; 83(2):235-40. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b2.10838. View

11.

Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G . ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005; 37(4):212-8. DOI: 10.1080/16501970510040263. View

12.

Jette A . Toward a common language of disablement. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009; 64(11):1165-8. PMC: 2759568. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glp093. View

13.

Cano S, Browne J, Lamping D, Roberts A, McGrouther D, Black N . The Patient Outcomes of Surgery-Hand/Arm (POS-Hand/Arm): a new patient-based outcome measure. J Hand Surg Br. 2004; 29(5):477-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.06.002. View

14.

Chung K, Hamill J, Walters M, Hayward R . The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ): assessment of responsiveness to clinical change. Ann Plast Surg. 1999; 42(6):619-22. DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199906000-00006. View

15.

Metcalf C, Adams J, Burridge J, Yule V, Chappell P . A review of clinical upper limb assessments within the framework of the WHO ICF. Musculoskeletal Care. 2007; 5(3):160-73. DOI: 10.1002/msc.108. View

16.

Chapman T, Richard R, Hedman T, Renz E, Wolf S, Holcomb J . Combat casualty hand burns: evaluating impairment and disability during recovery. J Hand Ther. 2008; 21(2):150-8. DOI: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.12.003. View

17.

Rosenbaum P, Stewart D . The World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health: a model to guide clinical thinking, practice and research in the field of cerebral palsy. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2004; 11(1):5-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.spen.2004.01.002. View

18.

Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S . Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2002; 34(5):205-10. DOI: 10.1080/165019702760279189. View

19.

Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Vercelli S, Pascariello B, Ferriero G . Suggestions for refinement of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH): a factor analysis and Rasch validation study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91(9):1370-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.022. View

20.

Velstra I, Ballert C, Cieza A . A systematic literature review of outcome measures for upper extremity function using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health as reference. PM R. 2011; 3(9):846-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.03.014. View