Iterative Model Reconstruction: Improved Image Quality of Low-tube-voltage Prospective ECG-gated Coronary CT Angiography Images at 256-slice CT
Overview
Affiliations
Objectives: To investigate the effects of a new model-based type of iterative reconstruction (M-IR) technique, the iterative model reconstruction, on image quality of prospectively gated coronary CT angiography (CTA) acquired at low-tube-voltage.
Methods: Thirty patients (16 men, 14 women; mean age 52.2 ± 13.2 years) underwent coronary CTA at 100-kVp on a 256-slice CT. Paired image sets were created using 3 types of reconstruction, i.e. filtered back projection (FBP), a hybrid type of iterative reconstruction (H-IR), and M-IR. Quantitative parameters including CT-attenuation, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. The visual image quality, i.e. graininess, beam-hardening, vessel sharpness, and overall image quality, was scored on a 5-point scale. Lastly, coronary artery segments were evaluated using a 4-point scale to investigate the assessability of each segment.
Results: There was no significant difference in coronary arterial CT attenuation among the 3 reconstruction methods. The mean image noise of FBP, H-IR, and M-IR images was 29.3 ± 9.6, 19.3 ± 6.9, and 12.9 ± 3.3 HU, respectively, there were significant differences for all comparison combinations among the 3 methods (p<0.01). The CNR of M-IR was significantly better than of FBP and H-IR images (13.5 ± 5.0 [FBP], 20.9 ± 8.9 [H-IR] and 39.3 ± 13.9 [M-IR]; p<0.01). The visual scores were significantly higher for M-IR than the other images (p<0.01), and 95.3% of the coronary segments imaged with M-IR were of assessable quality compared with 76.7% of FBP- and 86.9% of H-IR images.
Conclusions: M-IR can provide significantly improved qualitative and quantitative image quality in prospectively gated coronary CTA using a low-tube-voltage.
Abdalqader O, Hjouj M, Aljamal M, Hjouj F, Abuzaid M, Mousa M J Med Radiat Sci. 2024; 71(3):421-431.
PMID: 38941235 PMC: 11569399. DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.797.
Dobrolinska M, Tetteroo P, Greuter M, van Hamersvelt R, Prakken N, Slart R Eur Radiol. 2024; 34(8):4874-4882.
PMID: 38175219 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10544-z.
Yang L, Gao X, Gao C, Xu S, Cao S BMC Med Imaging. 2023; 23(1):161.
PMID: 37853358 PMC: 10585900. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-023-01107-1.
Jin L, Gao P, Wang K, Li J, Li M Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:840735.
PMID: 36186969 PMC: 9521173. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.840735.
Tang S, Liu Y, Wang Z, Liu Y, Liu H J Healthc Eng. 2021; 2021:5000102.
PMID: 34394893 PMC: 8360711. DOI: 10.1155/2021/5000102.