» Articles » PMID: 24868137

Pharmacokinetics and Retinal Toxicity of Various Doses of Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide in Rabbits

Overview
Journal Mol Vis
Date 2014 May 29
PMID 24868137
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the pharmacokinetics and retinal toxicity of various doses of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (TA) in rabbits.

Methods: The rabbits received intravitreal injections of 4 mg and 8 mg TA. The drug concentrations were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography after extraction from the vitreous at various time points. The main pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated with 3p97 pharmacokinetics software. The intraocular pressure, electroretinography, and pathological examinations were evaluated before and after intravitreal injection of different doses of TA.

Results: The half-life of intravitreal injection of 4 mg and 8 mg TA was 24 days and 34 days, respectively. No significant differences were found in intraocular pressure (p>0.05) and the electroretinography b-wave amplitudes (p>0.05) among the rabbits before and after intravitreal injection of 4 mg and 8 mg TA. Light and electron microscopy did not show any retinal damage in any group.

Conclusions: Intravitreal injection of 4 mg and 8 mg TA are safe for the rabbit retina. The injection of 8 mg TA produced a longer vitreous half-life and had a prolonged effect on the retina. This conclusion may be referenced in the clinical application of TA in retinal diseases.

Citing Articles

In Vivo Ocular Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Siponimod in Albino Rabbits.

Alshaikh R, El Din R, Zaki R, Waeber C, Ryan K Mol Pharm. 2024; 21(7):3310-3320.

PMID: 38856116 PMC: 11220753. DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00063.


In Situ Formation of Injectable Gelatin Methacryloyl (GelMA) Hydrogels for Effective Intraocular Delivery of Triamcinolone Acetonide.

Shen C, Zhao X, Ren Z, Yang B, Wang X, Hu A Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(5).

PMID: 36902389 PMC: 10003315. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054957.


Internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery.

Pradhan D, Agarwal L, Joshi I, Kushwaha A, Aditya K, Kumari A Ger Med Sci. 2022; 20:Doc07.

PMID: 35813123 PMC: 9204259. DOI: 10.3205/000309.


Comparative study on pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intravitreal and sub-Tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide in ocular tissues.

Arie Y, Miyai H, Suzuki A, Okabe T, Takashima M, Takata M Int J Ophthalmol. 2020; 13(12):1864-1871.

PMID: 33344183 PMC: 7708352. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2020.12.04.


Effect of fluocinolone acetonide 0.2 μg/day implant on the decision to drive in patients with diabetic macular oedema: a report from the FAME study.

Grewal D, Fletcher D, Hariprasad S, Suner I BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020; 4(1):e000405.

PMID: 31909197 PMC: 6936565. DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000405.


References
1.
Spandau U, Derse M, Schmitz-Valckenberg P, Papoulis C, Jonas J . Dosage dependency of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide as treatment for diabetic macular oedema. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89(8):999-1003. PMC: 1772791. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2004.062596. View

2.
Kwon S, Kim Y, Bang Y, Lee J, Park I . Comparison of natural course, intravitreal triamcinolone, and intravitreal bevacizumab for treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 29(1):5-9. DOI: 10.1089/jop.2011.0249. View

3.
Pearson P, Jaffe G, Martin D, Cordahi G, Grossniklaus H, Schmeisser E . Evaluation of a delivery system providing long-term release of cyclosporine. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996; 114(3):311-7. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100130307014. View

4.
Li Y, Chen H, Hou J, Zhang Y, Li G, Gu X . Further characterization of ocular safety profile of commercially available preserved and preservative-free triamcinolone acetonide. Retina. 2011; 32(2):364-74. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31821e1f7c. View

5.
Kim H, Csaky K, Gravlin L, Yuan P, Lutz R, Bungay P . Safety and pharmacokinetics of a preservative-free triamcinolone acetonide formulation for intravitreal administration. Retina. 2006; 26(5):523-30. DOI: 10.1097/00006982-200605000-00005. View