» Articles » PMID: 24858863

Low Socioeconomic Status is Associated with Increased Risk for Hypoglycemia in Diabetes Patients: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)

Overview
Date 2014 May 27
PMID 24858863
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Social risk factors for hypoglycemia are not well understood.

Methods: Cross-sectional analysis from the DISTANCE study, a multi-language, ethnically-stratified random sample of adults in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California diabetes registry, conducted in 2005-2006 (response rate 62%). Exposures were income and educational attainment; outcome was patient report of severe hypoglycemia. To test the association, we used multivariable logistic regression to adjust for demographic and clinical factors.

Results: 14,357 patients were included. Reports of severe hypoglycemia were common (11%), and higher in low-income vs. high-income (16% vs. 8.8) and low-education vs. high-education (11.9% vs. 8.9%) groups. In multivariable analysis, incomes of less than $15,000 (OR 1.51 95%CI 1.19-1.91), $15,000-$24,999 (OR 1.57 95%CI 1.27-1.94), and high school or less education (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.24-1.63) were associated with increased hypoglycemia, similar to insulin use (OR 1.44 95%CI 1.19-1.74).

Conclusions: Low income and educational attainment are important risk factors for hypoglycemia.

Citing Articles

Diabetes-related cognitive impairment: Mechanisms, symptoms, and treatments.

Yu X, He H, Wen J, Xu X, Ruan Z, Hu R Open Med (Wars). 2025; 20(1):20241091.

PMID: 39822993 PMC: 11737369. DOI: 10.1515/med-2024-1091.


Racial and ethnic disparities in the burden of non-obese type 2 diabetes using different anthropometric measurements.

Sui J, Wu B, Zheng Y, Mo Z, Dong Q, oan L Obes Med. 2024; 53.

PMID: 39712367 PMC: 11658266. DOI: 10.1016/j.obmed.2024.100573.


Effectiveness of Multilevel and Multidomain Interventions to Improve Glycemic Control in U.S. Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Falk E, Staab E, Deckard A, Uranga S, Thomas N, Wan W Diabetes Care. 2024; 47(9):1704-1712.

PMID: 39190927 PMC: 11362130. DOI: 10.2337/dc24-0375.


Food Insecurity and Hypoglycemia among Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Insulin or Sulfonylureas: The Diabetes & Aging Study.

Karter A, Parker M, Huang E, Seligman H, Moffet H, Ralston J J Gen Intern Med. 2024; 39(13):2400-2406.

PMID: 38767746 PMC: 11436613. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08801-y.


A novel electronic health record-based, machine-learning model to predict severe hypoglycemia leading to hospitalizations in older adults with diabetes: A territory-wide cohort and modeling study.

Shi M, Yang A, Lau E, Luk A, Ma R, Kong A PLoS Med. 2024; 21(4):e1004369.

PMID: 38607977 PMC: 11014435. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004369.


References
1.
Wright A, Cull C, MacLeod K, Holman R . Hypoglycemia in Type 2 diabetic patients randomized to and maintained on monotherapy with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin for 6 years from diagnosis: UKPDS73. J Diabetes Complications. 2006; 20(6):395-401. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2005.08.010. View

2.
Gelberg L, Andersen R, Leake B . The Behavioral Model for Vulnerable Populations: application to medical care use and outcomes for homeless people. Health Serv Res. 2000; 34(6):1273-302. PMC: 1089079. View

3.
Waitzfelder B, Gerzoff R, Karter A, Crystal S, Bair M, Ettner S . Correlates of depression among people with diabetes: The Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Prim Care Diabetes. 2010; 4(4):215-22. PMC: 4269468. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2010.07.002. View

4.
Hemmingsen B, Lund S, Gluud C, Vaag A, Almdal T, Hemmingsen C . Targeting intensive glycaemic control versus targeting conventional glycaemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (6):CD008143. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008143.pub2. View

5.
Braveman P, Cubbin C, Egerter S, Chideya S, Marchi K, Metzler M . Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all. JAMA. 2005; 294(22):2879-88. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.22.2879. View