» Articles » PMID: 24855046

Medical Students and Personal Smartphones in the Clinical Environment: the Impact on Confidentiality of Personal Health Information and Professionalism

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2014 May 24
PMID 24855046
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Smartphones are becoming ubiquitous in health care settings. The increased adoption of mobile technology such as smartphones may be attributed to their use as a point-of-care information source and to perceived improvements in clinical communication and efficiency. However, little is known about medical students' use of personal smartphones for clinical work.

Objective: The intent of the study was to examine final-year medical students' experience with and attitudes toward using personal mobile technology in the clinical environment, with respect to the perceived impact on patient confidentiality and provider professionalism.

Methods: Cross-sectional surveys were completed by final-year medical students at the University of Toronto. Respondents were asked about the type of personal mobile phone they use, security features on their personal phone, experiences using their personal phone during clinical rotations, and attitudes about using their personal phone for clinical work purposes.

Results: The overall response rate was 45.4% (99/218). Smartphone ownership was prevalent (98%, 97/99) with the majority (86%, 85/99) of participants using their personal phones for patient-related communication during clinical rotations. A total of 26% (26/99) of participants reported not having any type of security feature on their personal phone, 94% (90/96) of participants agreed that using their personal phone for clinical work makes them more efficient, and 86% (82/95) agreed that their personal phone allows them to provide better patient care. Although 68% (65/95) of participants believe that the use of personal phones for patient-related communication with colleagues poses a risk to the privacy and confidentiality of patient health information, 22% (21/96) of participants still use their personal phone to text or email identifiable patient data to colleagues.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the use of personal smartphones for clinical work by medical students is prevalent. There is a need to more fully address the threat to patient confidentiality posed by the use of unsecured communication devices such as smartphones.

Citing Articles

Exploring smartphone use and its applicability in academic training of medical students in Latin America: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Izquierdo-Condoy J, Arias-Intriago M, Nati-Castillo H, Gollini-Mihalopoulos R, Cardozo-Espinola C, Loaiza-Guevara V BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):1401.

PMID: 39616324 PMC: 11607876. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-06334-w.


Effectiveness and satisfaction with virtual and donor dissections: A randomized controlled trial.

Yun Y, Kwon H, Jeon S, Jon Y, Park M, Shin D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16388.

PMID: 39014004 PMC: 11252307. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66292-7.


Let's get active: The use of technology-enhanced audience interaction to promote active learning.

Mand S, Cico S, Haas M, Schnabel N, Schnapp B AEM Educ Train. 2024; 8(Suppl 1):S50-S55.

PMID: 38774823 PMC: 11102944. DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10950.


Integrated secure messaging to enhance medical education: a mixed methods study.

Nichols L, Guerrero D, Mannuru D, Basson M, Sahmoun A, Bande D BMC Med Educ. 2022; 22(1):580.

PMID: 35902846 PMC: 9333068. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03637-8.


Microbiological Contamination of Mobile Phones and Mobile Phone Hygiene of Final-Year Medical Students in Uganda: A Need for Educational Intervention.

Lubwama M, Kateete D, Ayazika K, Nalwanga W, Kagambo D, Nsubuga M Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021; 12:1247-1257.

PMID: 34737665 PMC: 8560070. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S333223.


References
1.
Wilson R, Runciman W, Gibberd R, Harrison B, Newby L, Hamilton J . The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. Med J Aust. 1995; 163(9):458-71. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1995.tb124691.x. View

2.
Davis J, Garcia G, Wyckoff M, Alsafran S, Graygo J, Withum K . Use of mobile learning module improves skills in chest tube insertion. J Surg Res. 2012; 177(1):21-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.03.022. View

3.
Edwards A, Fitzpatrick L, Augustine S, Trzebucki A, Cheng S, Presseau C . Synchronous communication facilitates interruptive workflow for attending physicians and nurses in clinical settings. Int J Med Inform. 2009; 78(9):629-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.04.006. View

4.
Clay C . Exploring the use of mobile technologies for the acquisition of clinical skills. Nurse Educ Today. 2010; 31(6):582-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.011. View

5.
Wu R, Tran K, Lo V, OLeary K, Morra D, Quan S . Effects of clinical communication interventions in hospitals: a systematic review of information and communication technology adoptions for improved communication between clinicians. Int J Med Inform. 2012; 81(11):723-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.05.014. View