» Articles » PMID: 24853859

Towards Standardisation of Cell-free DNA Measurement in Plasma: Controls for Extraction Efficiency, Fragment Size Bias and Quantification

Overview
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2014 May 24
PMID 24853859
Citations 111
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is becoming an important clinical analyte for prenatal testing, cancer diagnosis and cancer monitoring. The extraction stage is critical in ensuring clinical sensitivity of analytical methods measuring minority nucleic acid fractions, such as foetal-derived sequences in predominantly maternal cfDNA. Consequently, quality controls are required for measurement of extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and yield for validation of cfDNA methods. We evaluated the utility of an external DNA spike for monitoring these parameters in a study comparing three specific cfDNA extraction methods [QIAamp circulating nucleic acid (CNA) kit, NucleoSpin Plasma XS (NS) kit and FitAmp plasma/serum DNA isolation (FA) kit] with the commonly used QIAamp DNA blood mini (DBM) kit. We found that the extraction efficiencies of the kits ranked in the order CNA kit > DBM kit > NS kit > FA kit, and the CNA and NS kits gave a better representation of smaller DNA fragments in the extract than the DBM kit. We investigated means of improved reporting of cfDNA yield by comparing quantitative PCR measurements of seven different reference gene assays in plasma samples and validating these with digital PCR. We noted that the cfDNA quantities based on measurement of some target genes (e.g. TERT) were, on average, more than twofold higher than those of other assays (e.g. ERV3). We conclude that analysis and averaging of multiple reference genes using a GeNorm approach gives a more reliable estimate of total cfDNA quantity.

Citing Articles

Cell-free DNA release following psychosocial and physical stress in women and men.

Limberg A, Berg F, Koper E, Lindgraf C, Gevers C, Kumsta R Transl Psychiatry. 2025; 15(1):26.

PMID: 39863589 PMC: 11763022. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-025-03242-5.


Detection of Circulating Tumor DNA in Liquid Biopsy: Current Techniques and Potential Applications in Melanoma.

Martinez-Vila C, Teixido C, Aya F, Martin R, Gonzalez-Navarro E, Alos L Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 39859576 PMC: 11766255. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020861.


Individualized Cell-Free DNA Monitoring With Chromosomal Junctions for Mesothelioma.

Parikh K, Harris F, Karagouga G, Schrandt A, Mandrekar J, Johnson S JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024; 5(12):100692.

PMID: 39735890 PMC: 11671685. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100692.


Role of cell-free DNA levels in the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis and bacteremia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dadam M, Hien L, Makram E, Sieu L, Morad A, Khalil N PLoS One. 2024; 19(8):e0305895.

PMID: 39208340 PMC: 11361684. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305895.


Investigation of Extracted Plasma Cell-Free DNA as a Biomarker in Foals with Sepsis.

Hobbs K, Cooper B, Dembek K, Sheats M Vet Sci. 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39195800 PMC: 11359113. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11080346.


References
1.
Barrett A, McDonnell T, Chan K, Chitty L . Digital PCR analysis of maternal plasma for noninvasive detection of sickle cell anemia. Clin Chem. 2012; 58(6):1026-32. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.178939. View

2.
Sanders R, Huggett J, Bushell C, Cowen S, Scott D, Foy C . Evaluation of digital PCR for absolute DNA quantification. Anal Chem. 2011; 83(17):6474-84. DOI: 10.1021/ac103230c. View

3.
Tsang J, Lo Y . Circulating nucleic acids in plasma/serum. Pathology. 2007; 39(2):197-207. DOI: 10.1080/00313020701230831. View

4.
Benn P, Cuckle H, Pergament E . Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 42(1):15-33. DOI: 10.1002/uog.12513. View

5.
Wang B, Huang H, Chen Y, Bristow R, Kassauei K, Cheng C . Increased plasma DNA integrity in cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2003; 63(14):3966-8. View