» Articles » PMID: 24853269

Adult Age Differences in Frontostriatal Representation of Prediction Error but Not Reward Outcome

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2014 May 24
PMID 24853269
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Emerging evidence from decision neuroscience suggests that although younger and older adults show similar frontostriatal representations of reward magnitude, older adults often show deficits in feedback-driven reinforcement learning. In the present study, healthy adults completed reward-based tasks that did or did not depend on probabilistic learning, while undergoing functional neuroimaging. We observed reductions in the frontostriatal representation of prediction errors during probabilistic learning in older adults. In contrast, we found evidence for stability across adulthood in the representation of reward outcome in a task that did not require learning. Together, the results identify changes across adulthood in the dynamic coding of relational representations of feedback, in spite of preserved reward sensitivity in old age. Overall, the results suggest that the neural representation of prediction error, but not reward outcome, is reduced in old age. These findings reveal a potential dissociation between cognition and motivation with age and identify a potential mechanism for explaining changes in learning-dependent decision making in old adulthood.

Citing Articles

Mapping computational cognitive profiles of aging to dissociable brain and sociodemographic factors.

Marzuki A, Wong K, Chan J, Na S, Thanaraju A, Phon-Amnuaisuk P NPJ Aging. 2024; 10(1):50.

PMID: 39482289 PMC: 11527976. DOI: 10.1038/s41514-024-00171-3.


The effect of feedback timing on category learning and feedback processing in younger and older adults.

Nunn K, Creighton R, Tilton-Bolowsky V, Arbel Y, Vallila-Rohter S Front Aging Neurosci. 2024; 16:1404128.

PMID: 38887611 PMC: 11182045. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1404128.


The effect of time constraints on value-directed long-term memory in younger and older adults.

Hoover K, Murphy D, Middlebrooks C, Castel A Psychol Aging. 2024; 39(2):166-179.

PMID: 38271074 PMC: 10932845. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000795.


Predictions about reward outcomes in rhesus monkeys.

Huang Y, Chang H, Santos L, Rosati A Behav Neurosci. 2023; 138(1):43-58.

PMID: 38060026 PMC: 11287479. DOI: 10.1037/bne0000573.


Effects of positive and negative social feedback on motivation, evaluative learning, and socio-emotional processing.

Sobczak A, Bunzeck N NPJ Sci Learn. 2023; 8(1):28.

PMID: 37587116 PMC: 10432544. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-023-00178-7.


References
1.
Samanez-Larkin G, Gibbs S, Khanna K, Nielsen L, Carstensen L, Knutson B . Anticipation of monetary gain but not loss in healthy older adults. Nat Neurosci. 2007; 10(6):787-91. PMC: 2268869. DOI: 10.1038/nn1894. View

2.
Samson R, Barnes C . Impact of aging brain circuits on cognition. Eur J Neurosci. 2013; 37(12):1903-15. PMC: 3694726. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12183. View

3.
Cox K, Aizenstein H, Fiez J . Striatal outcome processing in healthy aging. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008; 8(3):304-17. PMC: 2597105. DOI: 10.3758/cabn.8.3.304. View

4.
Knutson B, Samanez-Larkin G, Kuhnen C . Gain and loss learning differentially contribute to life financial outcomes. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9):e24390. PMC: 3167846. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024390. View

5.
Eppinger B, Hammerer D, Li S . Neuromodulation of reward-based learning and decision making in human aging. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011; 1235:1-17. PMC: 3779838. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06230.x. View