» Articles » PMID: 2484920

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Dihydroquinidine and Quinidine on Ventricular Ectopy After Acute and Chronic Administration

Overview
Date 1988 Dec 1
PMID 2484920
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and antiarrhythmic activity of dihydroquinidine and quinidine in 14 patients (11 men, 3 women, aged 28 to 67 years) with heart disease and chronic, stable, high-frequency premature ventricular beats (PVB) (greater than 100/hr). A randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled protocol was utilized. During Holter monitoring the patients were given either dihydroquinidine or quinidine as the gluconates in an oral solution (600 mg); blood samples were taken 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours later. The patients were then assigned to three successive treatment periods of 7 days each: dihydroquinidine HCl (900 mg/day), quinidine polygalacturonate (1,650 mg/day), or placebo. At the end of each period 24-hour Holter monitoring was carried out and a blood sample was taken for determination of drug concentration. By comparing the area under the curves dihydroquinidine was 59% as available as quinidine; rates of absorption and elimination were similar. Mean peak blood levels of dihydroquinidine and quinidine were 1.06 +/- 0.34 and 2.15 +/- 0.96 micrograms/ml, respectively. After dihydroquinidine, eight patients had a positive response (greater than 50% reduction in PVB frequency), while seven patients responded to quinidine. During maintenance treatment both dihydroquinidine (233 +/- 330) and quinidine (234 +/- 311) reduced the mean PVB frequency per hour compared to placebo (690 +/- 569). Nine patients (64%) on dihydroquinidine and eight (57%) on quinidine had greater than 70% decrease in mean PVB frequency per hour. Steady-state peak plasma concentrations of dihydroquinidine and quinidine were 1.10 +/- 0.41 and 2.24 +/- 1.13 micrograms/ml, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Jurgens G, Graudal N, Kampmann J Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003; 42(7):647-63.

PMID: 12844326 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200342070-00004.

References
1.
CARLINER N, Crouthamel W, Fisher M, Mugmon M, Vassar D, Narang P . Quinidine therapy in hospitalized patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Am Heart J. 1979; 98(6):708-15. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(79)90467-8. View

2.
Gaughan C, LOWN B, Lanigan J, Voukydis P, Besser H . Acute oral testing for determining antiarrhythmic drug efficacy. I. Quinidine. Am J Cardiol. 1976; 38(6):677-84. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(76)90342-8. View

3.
Morganroth J, Michelson E, Horowitz L, Josephson M, Pearlman A, Dunkman W . Limitations of routine long-term electrocardiographic monitoring to assess ventricular ectopic frequency. Circulation. 1978; 58(3 Pt 1):408-14. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.58.3.408. View

4.
Hailey D, Lea A, Coles D, Heaume P, Smith W . Absorption of quinidine and dihydroquinidine in humans. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1981; 21(3):195-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00627920. View

5.
Ueda C, Williamson B, Dzindzio B . Disposition kinetics of dihydroquinidine following quinidine administration. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1976; 14(2):215-25. View