» Articles » PMID: 24847509

Management of Patients with ST-segment Elevation or Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes in Cardiac Rehabilitation Centers

Overview
Journal Clin Cardiol
Date 2014 May 22
PMID 24847509
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Current data on the management of patients in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after an acute hospital stay due to ST-segment elevation or non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (STE-ACS or NSTE-ACS) are limited. We aimed to describe patient characteristics, risk factor management, and lipid target achievement of patients in CR in Germany and compare the 2 groups.

Hypothesis: With respect to the risk factor pattern and treatment effects during a CR stay, there are important differences between STE-ACS and NSTE-ACS patients.

Methods: Comparison of 7950 patients by STE-ACS or NSTE-ACS status in the Transparency Registry to Objectify Guideline-Oriented Risk Factor Management registry (2010) who underwent an inpatient CR period of about 3 weeks.

Results: STE-ACS patients compared to NSTE-ACS patients were significantly younger (60.5 vs 64.4 years, P < 0.0001), and had diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or any risk factor (exception: smoking) less often. At discharge, in STE-ACS compared to NSTE-ACS patients, the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <100 mg/dL goal was achieved by 75.3% and 76.2%, respectively (LDL-C <70 mg/dL by 27.7% and 27.4%), the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal of >50 mg/dL in women and >40 mg/dL in men was achieved by 49.3% and 49.0%, respectively, and the triglycerides goal of <150 mg/dl was achieved by 72.3% and 74.3%, respectively (all comparisons not significant). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 121/74 and 123/74 mm Hg, respectively (P < 0.0001 systolic, diastolic not significant). The maximum exercise capacity was 110 and 102 W, respectively (P < 0.0001), and the maximum walking distance was 581 and 451 meters, respectively (P value not significant).

Conclusions: Patients with STE-ACS and NSTE-ACS differed moderately in their baseline characteristics. Both groups benefited from the participation in CR, as their lipid profile, blood pressure, and physical fitness improved.

Citing Articles

Healthcare professionals' views about delivering a rehabilitation programme for individuals living with Atrial Fibrillation: a cross - sectional survey.

Alhotye M, Evans R, Ng A, Singh S BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024; 16(1):227.

PMID: 39497137 PMC: 11536881. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-024-01000-6.


The Rationale and Design of the KOSovan Acute Coronary Syndrome (KOS-ACS) Registry.

Bajraktari G, Elezi S, Bytyci I, Ibrahimi P, Abdyli G, Pllana-Pruthi E Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(14).

PMID: 39061623 PMC: 11276365. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14141486.


Barriers and Facilitators to Delivering Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review.

Wasilewski M, Vijayakumar A, Szigeti Z, Sathakaran S, Wang K, Saporta A J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023; 16:2361-2376.

PMID: 37605772 PMC: 10440091. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S418803.


Heart rate recovery is useful for evaluating the recovery of exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation.

Tanaka S, Miyamoto T, Mori Y, Harada T, Tasaki H Heart Vessels. 2021; 36(10):1551-1557.

PMID: 33783632 PMC: 8379125. DOI: 10.1007/s00380-021-01839-6.


Fragmented QRS (fQRS) Complex Predicts Adverse Cardiac Events of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Thrombolysis.

Xia W, Feng X Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24:4634-4640.

PMID: 29974889 PMC: 6065281. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.908712.


References
1.
Terkelsen C, Lassen J, Norgaard B, Gerdes J, Jensen T, Gotzsche L . Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs. non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected cohort. Eur Heart J. 2004; 26(1):18-26. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi002. View

2.
Kashani A, Sallam T, Bheemreddy S, Mann D, Wang Y, Foody J . Review of side-effect profile of combination ezetimibe and statin therapy in randomized clinical trials. Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101(11):1606-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.041. View

3.
Salzwedel A, Nosper M, Rohrig B, Linck-Eleftheriadis S, Strandt G, Voller H . Outcome quality of in-patient cardiac rehabilitation in elderly patients--identification of relevant parameters. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012; 21(2):172-80. DOI: 10.1177/2047487312469475. View

4.
Hailer B, Naber C, Koslowski B, van Leeuwen P, Schafer H, Budde T . Gender-related differences in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results from the registry study of the ST elevation myocardial infarction network Essen. Clin Cardiol. 2011; 34(5):294-301. PMC: 6652718. DOI: 10.1002/clc.20916. View

5.
Bestehorn K, Wegscheider K, Voller H . Contemporary trends in cardiac rehabilitation in Germany: patient characteristics, drug treatment, and risk-factor management from 2000 to 2005. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008; 15(3):312-8. DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282f40e14. View